Improving the utility of speech recognition through error detection.

Despite the potential to dominate radiology reporting, current speech recognition technology is thus far a weak and inconsistent alternative to traditional human transcription. This is attributable to poor accuracy rates, in spite of vendor claims, and the wasted resources that go into correcting er...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 21; no. 4; pp. 371 - 378
Autores principales: Voll K, Atkins S, Forster B
Formato: equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2008
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105569276&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105569276
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2008
      vid: 21
      iid: 4
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105569276
        2010092430
        10.1007/s10278-007-9034-7
        NLM17387554
        105569276
      ppf: 371
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Improving the utility of speech recognition through error detection.
      aug:
        au:
          Voll K
          Atkins S
          Forster B
        affil: School of Computing Science, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, V5A1S6 Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Medical Transcription
          Radiography
          Voice Recognition Systems
          Automation
          Evaluation Research
          Funding Source
          Information Retrieval
          Reports
          Human
      ab: Despite the potential to dominate radiology reporting, current speech recognition technology is thus far a weak and inconsistent alternative to traditional human transcription. This is attributable to poor accuracy rates, in spite of vendor claims, and the wasted resources that go into correcting erroneous reports. A solution to this problem is post-speech-recognition error detection that will assist the radiologist in proofreading more efficiently. In this paper, we present a statistical method for error detection that can be applied after transcription. The results are encouraging, showing an error detection rate as high as 96% in some cases.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        equations & formulas
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N