Measuring the quality of transdisciplinary teams.
The Team Decision Making Questionnaire (TDMQ) demonstrated internal consistency, stability over time, and construct validity. Internal consistencies were excellent and Cronbach's Alphas (N = 102) for the 4 components ranged from 0.83 to 0.91. The internal consistency for the total instrument was 0.9...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Interprofessional Care Vol. 22; no. 6; pp. 612 - 621 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | questionnaire/scale research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Dec2008
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105582021&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105582021 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 13561820 57N jtl: Journal of Interprofessional Care issn: 13561820 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Dec2008 vid: 22 iid: 6 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 105582021 105582021 2010112011 10.1080/13561820802303664 NLM19012141 105582021 ppf: 612 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Measuring the quality of transdisciplinary teams. aug: au: Batorowicz B Shepherd TA affil: University of Western Ontario. sug: subj: Instrument Validation Multidisciplinary Care Team Evaluation Psychometrics Teamwork Evaluation Audiorecording Content Validity Data Analysis Software Data Analysis, Statistical Decision Making, Clinical Descriptive Statistics Focus Groups Funding Source Internal Consistency Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Multimethod Studies Ontario Questionnaires Self Report Support, Psychosocial Test-Retest Reliability Validation Studies Human ab: The Team Decision Making Questionnaire (TDMQ) demonstrated internal consistency, stability over time, and construct validity. Internal consistencies were excellent and Cronbach's Alphas (N = 102) for the 4 components ranged from 0.83 to 0.91. The internal consistency for the total instrument was 0.96. Test re-test reliability (N = 22) measured with Intraclass Correlation Coefficient was good. Transdisciplinary teamwork is widely practiced in health care. However, specific measures to evaluate transdisciplinary team decision-making are not described in the literature. The purpose of this study was to develop and psychometrically test a scale to measure the quality of transdisciplinary teamwork. A multi-method approach using focus groups, field testing, and quantitative instrument development procedures was used to develop and evaluate TDMQ. Principal component analysis (PCA) with a varimax rotation (N = 102) revealed a four-component solution resulting in a 19-item measure consisting of 4 subscales including Decision Making, Team Support, Learning, and Developing Quality Services. This study's findings support the use of the TDMQ for measuring the benefits of transdisciplinary teamwork. The four subscales of the measure provide insight into the nature of such benefits. To validate the TDMQ research is required with a greater number of health care professionals and in other clinical fields. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: questionnaire/scale research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|