Imagen de Portada
Código QR

Systematic reviews in clinical practice: evaluating evidence for management of acute whiplash-associated disorder.

Introduction: The methodology of systematic review (SR) has developed considerably in recent years. The SR is rated as providing the highest level of evidence as it applies rigour in combining findings from original evidence. However, concern has been expressed regarding the quality of some SRs. Cri...

Descripción completa

Publicado en:International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation Vol. 15; no. 8; pp. 333 - 343
Autores principales: Wright C, Rushton A, Gamlin J, Farrell D
Formato: research systematic review tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Mark Allen Holdings Limited Aug2008
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105657176&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105657176
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        17411645
        QTM
      jtl: International Journal of Therapy & Rehabilitation
      issn: 17411645
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2008
      vid: 15
      iid: 8
      pid: 11383
      pub: Mark Allen Holdings Limited
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105657176
        2010006784
        10.12968/ijtr.2008.15.8.30817
        105657176
      ppf: 333
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Systematic reviews in clinical practice: evaluating evidence for management of acute whiplash-associated disorder.
      aug:
        au:
          Wright C
          Rushton A
          Gamlin J
          Farrell D
        affil: College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham
      sug:
        subj:
          Systematic Review Methods
          Whiplash Injuries Therapy
          CINAHL Database
          Cochrane Library
          Embase
          Medline
          Physical Therapy Practice, Evidence-Based
          Physiotherapy Evidence Database
          PubMed
          Systematic Review
          Systematic Review History
          Human
      ab: Introduction: The methodology of systematic review (SR) has developed considerably in recent years. The SR is rated as providing the highest level of evidence as it applies rigour in combining findings from original evidence. However, concern has been expressed regarding the quality of some SRs. Critical evaluation of SRs is essential to ensure that they provide best evidence to inform management decisions in practice. Content: A background to SRs illustrates their development and importance to informing decisions for best practice, especially for the busy clinical practitioner. The characteristics of a SR are evaluated using an illustrated example of the development of a SR method to evaluate conservative physical management of patients with acute whiplash-associated disorder grade ll.Discussion and Conclusions: Understanding the key components of a SR enables effective critique of a published review. This in turn facilitates efficient use of the SR findings within clinical decision making in practice.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        systematic review
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N