A randomized study of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin in comparison to sequential intravenous ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime axetil in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia.

BACKGROUND: Empiric treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) should be focused on the suspected pathogens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin vs ceftriaxone in patients with HAP without risk of infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other non-fermentative Gram-negative ba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Infection Vol. 35; no. 6; pp. 414 - 421
Autores principales: Höffken G, Barth J, Rubinstein E, Beckmann H
Formato: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Dec2007
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105727133&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105727133
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        03008126
        NXO
      jtl: Infection
      issn: 03008126
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2007
      vid: 35
      iid: 6
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105727133
        2009753684
        10.1007/s15010-007-6193-x
        NLM18034211
        105727133
      ppf: 414
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: A randomized study of sequential intravenous/oral moxifloxacin in comparison to sequential intravenous ceftriaxone/oral cefuroxime axetil in patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia.
      aug:
        au:
          Höffken G
          Barth J
          Rubinstein E
          Beckmann H
        affil: Pulmonology, Medical Clinic 1, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, D-01309 Dresden, Germany
      sug:
        subj:
          Antiinfective Agents, Fluoroquinolone Administration and Dosage
          Cefuroxime Administration and Dosage
          Cross Infection Drug Therapy
          Pneumonia, Bacterial Drug Therapy
          Adult
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Analysis of Variance
          APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation)
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Clinical Trials
          Confidence Intervals
          Cross Infection Microbiology
          Descriptive Statistics
          Drug Administration Schedule
          Drug Therapy, Combination
          Female
          Funding Source
          Injections, Intravenous
          Male
          Middle Age
          Pneumonia, Bacterial Microbiology
          Questionnaires
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: BACKGROUND: Empiric treatment of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) should be focused on the suspected pathogens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin vs ceftriaxone in patients with HAP without risk of infections with Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other non-fermentative Gram-negative bacteria. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective, randomized, non-blind, multicentric and multinational study to compare the efficacy and safety of moxifloxacin 400 mg IV once daily followed by oral moxifloxacin 400 mg once daily to ceftriaxone 2 g IV once daily followed by oral cefuroxime axetil 500 mg twice daily to treat mild-to-moderate HAP in adult patients requiring initial parenteral therapy. The primary efficacy variable was clinical response 7-10 days after the end of a 7-14-day treatment period, secondary endpoints included clinical and bacteriologic response at different intervals for up to 31 days after treatment. The trial was terminated prematurely due to slow patient recruitment. RESULTS: A total of 161 subjects (87 men, 74 women) between 18 and 95 years of age were enrolled, 120 of whom were eligible for per protocol efficacy analyses (60 each in the moxifloxacin and the comparator groups). Clinical success rates were 87% for moxifloxacin and 83% for the comparator [95% CI (-9.77 to 15.96%)]. The results for secondary endpoints were comparable between groups. Both treatments were safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Moxifloxacin IV/oral can be considered as a possible alternative for the antibiotic treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate nosocomial pneumonia without risk factors for highly resistant microorganisms.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N