Human--robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions.
The goal of this research was to examine the ways in which human operators interact with simulated semiautonomous unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), semiautonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and teleoperated UGVs (Teleop). Robotic operators performed parallel route reconnaissance missions with e...
| Published in: | Military Psychology Vol. 20; no. 3; pp. 135 - 150 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Jul2008
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105806936&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105806936 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 08995605 7MP jtl: Military Psychology issn: 08995605 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2008 vid: 20 iid: 3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 105806936 105806936 2009973324 10.1080/08995600802115904 105806936 ppf: 135 ppct: 15 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Human--robot interaction in the context of simulated route reconnaissance missions. aug: au: Chen JYC Durlach PJ Sloan JA Bowens LD affil: US Army Research Laboratory, HRED, Orlando, Florida, USA sug: subj: Computer Simulation Military Services Psychomotor Performance Robotics Visual Perception Adolescence Adult Analysis of Covariance Correlation Coefficient Descriptive Statistics Experimental Studies Female Florida Funding Source Male Questionnaires Random Assignment Self Assessment Self Report Spatial Perception Students, College Time Factors User-Computer Interface Human Adolescent: 13-18 years Adult: 19-44 years Female Male ab: The goal of this research was to examine the ways in which human operators interact with simulated semiautonomous unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs), semiautonomous unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and teleoperated UGVs (Teleop). Robotic operators performed parallel route reconnaissance missions with each platform alone and with all three platforms. When given all three platforms, participants failed to detect more targets than when given only the UAV or UGV; they were also less likely to complete their mission in the allotted time. Target detection during missions was the poorest with the Teleop alone, likely because of the demands of remote driving. Spatial ability was found to be a good predictor of target-detection performance. However, slowing sensor feed video frame rate or the imposition of a short response latency (250 ms) between Teleop control and Teleop reaction failed to affect target-detection performance significantly. Nevertheless, these video image manipulations did influence assessment of system usability. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|