A Comparison between QLAB and TomTec Full Volume Reconstruction for Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Quantification of Left Ventricular Volumes.

Objectives: To compare the interobserver variability and accuracy of two different real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) analyzing programs. Methods: Forty-one patients (mean age 56 +/- 11 years, 28 men) in sinus rhythm with a cardiomyopathy and adequate 2D image quality underwent RT3...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Echocardiography Vol. 24; no. 9; pp. 967 - 975
Autores principales: Soliman OI, Krenning BJ, Geleijnse ML, Nemes A, van Geuns RJ, Baks T, Anwar AM, Galema TW, Vletter WB, Ten Cate FJ
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Oct2007
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105827301&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105827301
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        07422822
        GSE
      jtl: Echocardiography
      issn: 07422822
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2007
      vid: 24
      iid: 9
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105827301
        2009680665
        10.1111/j.1540-8175.2007.00502.x
        NLM17894576
        105827301
      ppf: 967
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: A Comparison between QLAB and TomTec Full Volume Reconstruction for Real Time Three-Dimensional Echocardiographic Quantification of Left Ventricular Volumes.
      aug:
        au:
          Soliman OI
          Krenning BJ
          Geleijnse ML
          Nemes A
          van Geuns RJ
          Baks T
          Anwar AM
          Galema TW
          Vletter WB
          Ten Cate FJ
        affil: Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and Department of Cardiology, Al-Hussein University Hospital, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
      sug:
        subj:
          Echocardiography, Three-Dimensional
          Myocardial Diseases Ultrasonography
          Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Ultrasonography
          Algorithms
          Female
          Image Processing, Computer Assisted
          Linear Regression
          Magnetic Resonance Imaging
          Male
          Middle Age
          Myocardial Diseases Physiopathology
          Observer Bias
          Ventricular Dysfunction, Left Pathology
          Human
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Objectives: To compare the interobserver variability and accuracy of two different real time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT3DE) analyzing programs. Methods: Forty-one patients (mean age 56 +/- 11 years, 28 men) in sinus rhythm with a cardiomyopathy and adequate 2D image quality underwent RT3DE and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) within one day. Off-line left ventricular (LV) volume analysis was performed with QLAB V4.2 (semiautomated border detection with biplane projections) and TomTec 4D LV analysis V2.0 (primarily manual tracking with triplane projections and semiautomated border detection). Results: Excellent correlations (R(2) > 0.98) were found between MRI and RT3DE. Bland-Altman analysis revealed an underestimated LV end-diastolic volume (LV-EDV) for both TomTec (-9.4 +/- 8.7 mL) and QLAB (-16.4 +/- 13.1 ml). Also, an underestimated LV end-systolic volume (LV-ESV) for both TomTec (-4.8 +/- 9.9 mL) and QLAB (-8.5 +/- 14.2 mL) was found. LV-EDV and LV-ESV were significantly more underestimated with QLAB software. Both programs accurately calculated LV ejection fraction (LV-EF) without a bias. Interobserver variability was 6.4 +/- 7.8% vs. 12.2 +/- 10.1% for LV-EDV, 7.8 +/- 9.7% vs. 13.6 +/- 11.2% for LV-ESV, and 7.1 +/- 6.9% vs. 9.7 +/- 8.8% for LV-EF for TomTec vs. QLAB, respectively. The analysis time was shorter with QLAB (4 +/- 2 minutes vs. 6 +/- 2 minutes, P < 0.05). Conclusions: RT3DE with TomTec or QLAB software analysis provides accurate LV-EF assessment in cardiomyopathic patients with distorted LV geometry and adequate 2D image quality. However, LV volumes may be somewhat more underestimated with the current QLAB software version.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N