Mobilization techniques in subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: randomized multiple-treatment trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the use of 3 mobilization techniques-end-range mobilization (ERM), mid-range mobilization (MRM), and mobilization with movement (MWM)-in the management of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome (FSS). SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight subjects wi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Physical Therapy Vol. 87; no. 10; pp. 1307 - 1316
Autores principales: Yang JI, Chang C, Chen S, Wang S, Lin J
Formato: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Oxford University Press / USA Oct2007
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105919728&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 105919728
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00319023
        PTH
      jtl: Physical Therapy
      issn: 00319023
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Oct2007
      vid: 87
      iid: 10
      pid: 10398
      pub: Oxford University Press / USA
    artinfo:
      ui:
        105919728
        105919728
        2009688103
        10.2522/ptj.20060295
        NLM17684085
        105919728
      ppf: 1307
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Mobilization techniques in subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome: randomized multiple-treatment trial.
      aug:
        au:
          Yang JI
          Chang C
          Chen S
          Wang S
          Lin J
        affil: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
      sug:
        subj:
          Adhesive Capsulitis Rehabilitation
          Joint Mobilization Methods
          Adhesive Capsulitis Physiopathology
          Adult
          Aged
          Analysis of Covariance
          Chi Square Test
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Clinical Trials
          Data Analysis Software
          Female
          Funding Source
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Kinematics
          Male
          Middle Age
          Range of Motion
          Recovery
          Scales
          T-Tests
          Treatment Outcomes
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the use of 3 mobilization techniques-end-range mobilization (ERM), mid-range mobilization (MRM), and mobilization with movement (MWM)-in the management of subjects with frozen shoulder syndrome (FSS). SUBJECTS: Twenty-eight subjects with FSS were recruited. METHODS: A multiple-treatment trial on 2 groups (A-B-A-C and A-C-A-B, where A=MRM, B=ERM, and C=MWM) was carried out. The duration of each treatment was 3 weeks, for a total of 12 weeks. Outcome measures included the functional score and shoulder kinematics. RESULTS: Overall, subjects in both groups improved over the 12 weeks. Statistically significant improvements were found in ERM and MWM. Additionally, MWM corrected scapulohumeral rhythm significantly better than ERM did. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: In subjects with FSS, ERM and MWM were more effective than MRM in increasing mobility and functional ability. Movement strategies in terms of scapulohumeral rhythm improved after 3 weeks of MWM.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N