Readiness to exercise: a comparison of 3 instruments and an interview.
Exercise stage of change (ESOC), or readiness to exercise, has been measured using at least 13 instruments and 4 interviews, yet no comparison studies are available to determine optimal measures for use by health care providers. This pilot study compares ESOC classification between 3 instruments (sc...
| Publicado en: | Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing Vol. 22; no. 4; pp. 201 - 207 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , , |
| Formato: | algorithm research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Fall2007
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=105970870&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 105970870 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 08897204 D6V jtl: Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing issn: 08897204 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Fall2007 vid: 22 iid: 4 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 105970870 2009736410 10.1111/j.0889-7204.2007.06494.x NLM18059197 105970870 ppf: 201 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Readiness to exercise: a comparison of 3 instruments and an interview. aug: au: Fish AF Frid DJ Mitchell GL Fish JL Christman SK Astroth KS affil: College of Nursing, University of Missouri-St Louis, One University Boulevard, St Louis, MO 63121; fisha@msx.umsl.edu sug: subj: Behavioral Changes Change Theory Exercise Adult Age Factors Chi Square Test Conceptual Framework Confidence Intervals Convenience Sample Cross Sectional Studies Descriptive Research Descriptive Statistics Educational Status Effect Size Friedman Test Instrument Validation kappa Statistic Models, Theoretical One-Way Analysis of Variance Pilot Studies Scales Sex Factors Spearman's Rank Correlation Coefficient Structured Interview Human Adult: 19-44 years ab: Exercise stage of change (ESOC), or readiness to exercise, has been measured using at least 13 instruments and 4 interviews, yet no comparison studies are available to determine optimal measures for use by health care providers. This pilot study compares ESOC classification between 3 instruments (scale-ladder, scale-true/false, and scale-5 choice); explores the feasibility of using a face-to-face structured interview; compares classification between instruments and interview; and examines the influence of sex, age, and education level on stage classification. Thirty healthy adults completed ESOC instruments in random order and then the interview. Scale-ladder and scale-true/false instruments exhibited almost perfect agreement (weighted kappa, 0.897). All instruments exhibited substantial agreement with interview (weighted kappa, 0.620-0.790). Stage classification did not differ significantly by sex, age, or education level. The authors recommend word clarification revision of the scale-5 choice instrument and further testing of the interview. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: algorithm research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|