What is the role of quality circles in strategies to optimise antibiotic prescribing? A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on antibiotic prescribing of an intervention in existing local quality circles promoting an evidence-based guideline for acute rhinosinusitis. DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial comparing standard dissemination of the guideline by mail with an a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Quality & Safety in Health Care Vol. 16; no. 3; pp. 197 - 203
Autores principales: van Driel ML, Coenen S, Dirven K, Lobbestael J, Janssens I, Van Royen P, Haaijer-Ruskamp FM, De Meyere M, De Maeseneer J, Christiaens T
Formato: research randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group Jun2007
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106009739&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106009739
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14753898
        C0K
      jtl: Quality & Safety in Health Care
      issn: 14753898
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2007
      vid: 16
      iid: 3
      pid: 8280
      pub: BMJ Publishing Group
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106009739
        106009739
        2009606990
        10.1136/qshc.2006.018663
        NLM17545346
        106009739
      ppf: 197
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: What is the role of quality circles in strategies to optimise antibiotic prescribing? A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial in primary care.
      aug:
        au:
          van Driel ML
          Coenen S
          Dirven K
          Lobbestael J
          Janssens I
          Van Royen P
          Haaijer-Ruskamp FM
          De Meyere M
          De Maeseneer J
          Christiaens T
      sug:
        subj:
          Antibiotics Therapeutic Use
          Audit
          Drug Utilization
          Family Practice Standards
          Guideline Adherence
          Quality Circles
          Rhinitis Drug Therapy
          Sinusitis Drug Therapy
          Acute Disease
          Adult
          Belgium
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Cluster Analysis
          Female
          Male
          Middle Age
          Primary Health Care Standards
          Questionnaires
          Risk Factors
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on antibiotic prescribing of an intervention in existing local quality circles promoting an evidence-based guideline for acute rhinosinusitis. DESIGN: A pragmatic cluster-randomised controlled trial comparing standard dissemination of the guideline by mail with an additional strategy using quality circles. SETTING: General practice in Flanders, Belgium. PARTICIPANTS: General practitioners (GPs) in 18 local quality circles were randomly allocated to two study arms. All GPs received the guideline by mail. GPs in the nine quality circles allocated to the intervention arm received an additional group intervention, which consisted of one self-led meeting using material introduced to the group moderator by a member of the research team. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Adherence to the guideline was measured as differences in the proportion of antibiotic prescriptions, including the choice of antibiotic, between the two study arms after the intervention period. GPs registered their encounters with patients presenting with signs and symptoms of acute rhinosinusitis in a booklet designed for the study. RESULTS: A total of 75 doctors (29% of GPs in the participating quality circles) registered 408 consultations. In the intervention group, 56.9% of patients received an antibiotic compared with 58.3% in the control group. First-choice antibiotics were issued in 34.5% of antibiotic prescriptions in the intervention group compared with 29.4% in the control group. After adjusting for patient and GP characteristics, the ORadj for antibiotics prescribed in the intervention arm compared with the control arm was 0.63 (95% CI 0.29 to 1.37). There was no effect on the choice of antibiotic (ORadj 1.07, 95% CI 0.34 to 3.37). CONCLUSION: A single intervention in quality circles of GPs integrated in the group's normal working procedure did not have a significant effect on the quality of antibiotic prescribing. More attention to the context and structure of primary care practice, and insight into the process of self-reflective learning may provide clues to optimise the effectiveness of quality circles.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N