Cover Image
QR Code

Is qualitative research scientific, or merely relevant?

Objective - To compare the assessments of primary care and hospital physicians of quantitative and qualitative research abstracts, and to analyse what they put into 'scientific accuracy'. Design and subjects - Two fictive research abstracts, one quantitative the other qualitative in design, were con...

Full description

Published in:Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Vol. 21; no. 1; pp. 10 - 11
Main Authors: Johansson EE, Risberg G, Hamberg K
Format: research Journal Article
Published: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2003
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106023125&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106023125
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        02813432
        BDB
      jtl: Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
      issn: 02813432
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2003
      vid: 21
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106023125
        106023125
        2009386673
        10.1080/02813430310000492
        NLM12718454
        106023125
      ppf: 10
      ppct: 1
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Is qualitative research scientific, or merely relevant?
      aug:
        au:
          Johansson EE
          Risberg G
          Hamberg K
      sug:
        subj:
          Attitude of Health Personnel
          Evaluation Research
          Health Services Research Methods
          Medical Staff, Hospital Psychosocial Factors
          Physicians, Family Psychosocial Factors
          Qualitative Studies
          Adult
          Female
          Male
          Middle Age
          Reproducibility of Results
          Sweden
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Objective - To compare the assessments of primary care and hospital physicians of quantitative and qualitative research abstracts, and to analyse what they put into 'scientific accuracy'. Design and subjects - Two fictive research abstracts, one quantitative the other qualitative in design, were constructed. Randomly selected Swedish physicians were asked to appraise the two designs for linguistic clarity, clinical relevance, interest value, trustworthiness and scientific accuracy. Main outcome measures - 286 primary care and 396 hospital physicians delivered complete answers. Their assessments were analysed and compared using Pearson's chi-square test, multivariate logistic regression analyses and Spearman's rho. Results - Primary care physicians and hospital physicians judged the quantitative abstract similarly. More primary care physicians than hospital physicians appreciated the qualitative abstract. Both primary care and hospital physicians assessed scientific accuracy of the quantitative abstract more highly than clinical relevance, while the qualitative abstract was appreciated more for its relevance than for its scientific accuracy. Conclusions - The study indicates that qualitative research is valued for its relevance, but is considered lacking in scientific accuracy. To encourage high scientific quality and relevance in medical research, we need to enhance knowledge about qualitative methods, and their scientific guidelines, especially when complex and comprehensive phenomena are to be studied.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N