Limitations of tachycardia confirmation and rate classification algorithms in a third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator.

Newer ICDs provide antitachycardia (ATP) and bradycardia pacing and cardioversion and defibrillation shocks based on sensed interval criteria. The objectives of this investigation were to determine the algorithm related errors in tachycardia confirmation and rate classification that occurred in pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 19; no. 11; pp. 1618 - 1629
Autores principales: Stambler BS, Wood MA, Ellenbogen KA
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Nov1996
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106039450&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106039450
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01478389
        4F8
      jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
      issn: 01478389
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov1996
      vid: 19
      iid: 11
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106039450
        2009416384
        NLM8946459
        106039450
      ppf: 1618
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Limitations of tachycardia confirmation and rate classification algorithms in a third-generation implantable cardioverter defibrillator.
      aug:
        au:
          Stambler BS
          Wood MA
          Ellenbogen KA
      sug:
      ab: Newer ICDs provide antitachycardia (ATP) and bradycardia pacing and cardioversion and defibrillation shocks based on sensed interval criteria. The objectives of this investigation were to determine the algorithm related errors in tachycardia confirmation and rate classification that occurred in patients with a third-generation, noncommitted, tiered ICD therapy. Forty-three consecutive patients with the Guardian ATP 4210 ICD, which uses an X out of Y sensed interval counting algorithm for tachycardia detection, confirmation, and classification were studied. Surface ECGs, intracardiac electrograms, stored data logs, and sense histories were reviewed to diagnose errors due to these algorithms that resulted in delivery of inappropriate therapy or inhibition of appropriate therapy. Sixty-eight classification or confirmation algorithm errors from 7,610 tachycardia detections (< 1%) were diagnosed in 23 (53%) of 43 patients. Three types of errors not related to device or sensing lead malfunction or programming mistakes were seen. In 26 episodes, the confirmation algorithm failed to detect late tachycardia reversion of nonsustained tachyarrhythmias, on the last or next to last sensed interval, and did not inhibit ATP (n = 17) or shocks (n = 9). In 28 episodes, inaccurate classification of tachycardia rate resulted in inappropriate ATP (n = 23) or shock (n = 5) therapy. In 14 episodes, the posttherapy reconfirmation algorithm produced inhibition of VVI pacing and prolonged asystole following shock therapy. These errors in tachycardia confirmation and rate classification were due to the inherent limitations of the X out of Y counting algorithm.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N