Guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia within disease management programs: a practical approach to antibacterial selection and guideline implementation.
Several national and international organizations have developed and published guidelines for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Guidelines from Europe, the US, Canada and Latin America classify patients in different groups based on the severity of pneumonia, site of c...
| Publicado en: | Disease Management & Health Outcomes Vol. 11; no. 1; pp. 33 - 44 |
|---|---|
| Autor principal: | |
| Formato: | Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jan2003
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | Several national and international organizations have developed and published guidelines for the treatment of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Guidelines from Europe, the US, Canada and Latin America classify patients in different groups based on the severity of pneumonia, site of care and presence of risk factors for resistant organisms. The initial antibacterial therapy is designed to cover only the likely organisms able to infect a particular group of patients. An evaluation of current guidelines indicates that there are significant similarities in regard to classification of patients and initial antibacterial therapy. One objective of this review is to present the clinician with a practical approach to antibacterial selection based on current published guidelines for CAP. Although most of the care recommended in guidelines is evidence-based and associated with better clinical outcomes and/or decreased healthcare cost, there is still a significant gap between recommended care and actual care of patients with CAP. Dissemination of guidelines at the local level has proved to have a minimal effect in changing local practices. To bring the local care of patients with CAP closer to the care recommended in guidelines, it is necessary to have an appropriate plan for guideline implementation. This review provides the clinician and other healthcare decision-makers with a methodology for implementation of national guidelines at the local hospital level. |
|---|