Imagen de Portada
Código QR

A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative...

In an intervention phase, 38 operators used four different imposed screen positions (near versus distant, high versus low) for a full working day to experience the advantages and disadvantages. Screens at about 66 cm induced more reported strain than screens at about 98 cm. When operators later free...

Descripción completa

Publicado en:Ergonomics Vol. 42; no. 4; pp. 535 - 536
Autores principales: Jaschinski W, Heuer H
Formato: research Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr99
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106085078&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106085078
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00140139
        ERO
      jtl: Ergonomics
      issn: 00140139
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr99
      vid: 42
      iid: 4
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106085078
        106085078
        2009406679
        10.1080/001401399185450
        NLM10204419
        106085078
      ppf: 535
      ppct: 1
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A procedure to determine the individually comfortable position of visual displays relative...
      aug:
        au:
          Jaschinski W
          Heuer H
      sug:
        subj:
          Computer Terminals Standards
          Data Display Standards
          Health Promotion Methods
          Posture Physiology
          Analysis of Variance
          Occupational Health
          Prospective Studies
          Treatment Outcomes
          Human
      ab: In an intervention phase, 38 operators used four different imposed screen positions (near versus distant, high versus low) for a full working day to experience the advantages and disadvantages. Screens at about 66 cm induced more reported strain than screens at about 98 cm. When operators later freely selected their individually most comfortable screen position, individually different changes due to the intervention were observed: some subjects changed to shorter, others to longer viewing distances, some operators adjusted the screen lower, others higher. These effects were confirmed in repeated tests. Thus, trying out different screen positions appears useful for arranging the VDU workstation to the individually most comfortable screen location relative to the eyes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N