Paroxysmal bundle branch block of supraventricular origin: a possible source of misdiagnosis in detecting ventricular tachycardia using time domain analyses of intraventricular electrograms.

Current implantable antitachycardia devices use several methods for differentiating sinus rhythm (SR) from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) or ventricular tachycardia (VT). Those methods include sustained high rate, the rate of onset, changes in cycle length, and sudden onset. Additional methods f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 13; no. 4; pp. 453 - 469
Autores principales: Throne RD, Dicarlo LA, Jenkins JM, Winston SA
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr1990
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106086720&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106086720
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01478389
        4F8
      jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
      issn: 01478389
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr1990
      vid: 13
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106086720
        2009412359
        NLM1692129
        106086720
      ppf: 453
      ppct: 16
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Paroxysmal bundle branch block of supraventricular origin: a possible source of misdiagnosis in detecting ventricular tachycardia using time domain analyses of intraventricular electrograms.
      aug:
        au:
          Throne RD
          Dicarlo LA
          Jenkins JM
          Winston SA
      sug:
        subj:
          Bundle-Branch Block Diagnosis
          Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
          Tachycardia Diagnosis
          Tachycardia, Supraventricular Diagnosis
          Adolescence
          Adult
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Bundle-Branch Block Physiopathology
          Electrocardiography
          Female
          Heart Rate Physiology
          Heart Ventricle
          Male
          Middle Age
          Models, Statistical
          Myocardial Contraction Physiology
          Tachycardia Physiopathology
          Tachycardia, Supraventricular Physiopathology
          Time Factors
          Adolescent: 13-18 years
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Current implantable antitachycardia devices use several methods for differentiating sinus rhythm (SR) from supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) or ventricular tachycardia (VT). Those methods include sustained high rate, the rate of onset, changes in cycle length, and sudden onset. Additional methods for detecting VT include techniques based upon ventricular electrogram morphology. The morphological approach is based on the assumption that the direction of cardiac activation, as sensed by a bipolar electrode in the ventricle, is different when the patient is in SR as compared to VT. Whether paroxysmal bundle branch block of supraventricular origin (BBB) can be differentiated from VT has not been determined. In this study, we compared the morphology of the ventricular electrogram during sinus rhythm with a normal QRS (SRNlQRS) or SVT with a normal QRS (SVTNlQRS) with the morphologies of BBB and VT in 30 patients undergoing cardiac electrophysiology studies. Changes in ventricular electrogram morphology were determined using three previously proposed time domain methods for VT detection: Correlation Waveform Analysis (CWA), Area of Difference (AD), and Amplitude Distribution Analysis (ADA). CWA, AD, and ADA distinguished VT from SRNlQRS or SVTNlQRS in 16/17 (94%), 14/17 (82%), and 12/17 (71%) patients, and BBB from SRNlQRS or SVTNlQRS in 15/15 (100%), 13/15 (87%), and 6/15 (40%) patients, respectively. However, the ranges of values during BBB using these methods overlapped with ranges of values during VT in all cases for CWA, AD, and ADA. Hence, BBB may be a source of misdiagnosis in detecting VT when these time domain methods are used for ventricular electrogram analysis.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N