Automatic implantable defibrillator discharge resulting from routine pacemaker programming.
A middle-aged gentleman with an idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, drug-refractory sustained ventricular arrhythmia, and high-degree AV block was managed with an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) and a Cordis Multicor II VVI pacemaker. During a routine follow-up visit, the pace...
| Published in: | Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 11; no. 3; pp. 336 - 339 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | case study Journal Article |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
Mar1988
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106086951&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106086951 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01478389 4F8 jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology issn: 01478389 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar1988 vid: 11 iid: 3 pid: 480 pub: Wiley-Blackwell place: Malden, Massachusetts artinfo: ui: 106086951 2009413011 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb05013.x NLM2452422 106086951 ppf: 336 ppct: 3 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Automatic implantable defibrillator discharge resulting from routine pacemaker programming. aug: au: Gottlieb C Miller JM Rosenthal ME Marchlinski FE sug: subj: Cardioversion Equipment and Supplies Pacemaker, Artificial Prostheses and Implants Electrocardiography Equipment Failure Male Middle Age Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male ab: A middle-aged gentleman with an idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy, drug-refractory sustained ventricular arrhythmia, and high-degree AV block was managed with an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (AICD) and a Cordis Multicor II VVI pacemaker. During a routine follow-up visit, the pacemaker threshold was determined. Seven seconds after reprogramming the Cordis pacemaker to the 'star' VVI mode, the AICD discharged. The time to discharge after reprogramming the pacemaker equalled the previously determined AICD charge time. No other rhythm disturbance was documented and the rate with double counting of pacemaker stimulus and QRS complex was less than the triggering rate for the AICD. In conclusion, the AICD can be triggered by pacemaker programming signals unrelated to subsequent pacemaker function. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: case study Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|