Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies? a randomized, prospective study.

Introduction: Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are the main cause of inappropriate therapies in patients with conventional single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (VVI-ICD). It was anticipated that dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators (DDD-ICD), with their capacity to analyze atr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Vol. 12; no. 2; pp. 134 - 143
Autores principales: Deisenhofer I, Kolb C, Ndrepepa G, Schreieck J, Karch M, Schmieder S, Zrenner B, Schmitt C
Formato: clinical trial research Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2001
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106089077&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106089077
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10453873
        GSB
      jtl: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
      issn: 10453873
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2001
      vid: 12
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106089077
        2009418992
        10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00134.x
        NLM11232608
        106089077
      ppf: 134
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies? a randomized, prospective study.
      aug:
        au:
          Deisenhofer I
          Kolb C
          Ndrepepa G
          Schreieck J
          Karch M
          Schmieder S
          Zrenner B
          Schmitt C
      sug:
        subj:
          Atrial Fibrillation Therapy
          Defibrillators, Implantable Adverse Effects
          Aged
          Atrial Fibrillation Physiopathology
          Clinical Trials
          Female
          Male
          Middle Age
          Prospective Studies
          Human
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Introduction: Supraventricular tachyarrhythmias are the main cause of inappropriate therapies in patients with conventional single chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (VVI-ICD). It was anticipated that dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators (DDD-ICD), with their capacity to analyze atrial and ventricular rhythm, could substantially reduce inappropriate therapies. Methods and Results: Our prospective study included 92 patients (87 men; mean age 61 ± 12.7 years) who were randomly assigned to a VVI-ICD (45 patients) or a DDD-ICD (47 patients). Both groups were followed for 7.5 ± 3.5 and 7.6 ± 4.1 months, respectively. During the follow-up period, overall 725 ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) episodes were recorded in 45 (49%) of 92 patients. Of these episodes, 404 (56%) occurred in the VVI-ICD group and 321 (44%) episodes occurred in the DDD-ICD group. Twenty-three (51%) patients in the VVI-ICD group and 22 (47%) patients in the DDD-ICD group (P = 0.8) developed VT/VF. Overall, 73 (10%) of 725 treated episodes were inappropriate in 6 (13%) patients in the WI group and in 10 (21%) patients in the DDD-ICD group (P = 0.2). There were 22 (31%) inappropriately treated episodes in the VVI-ICD group and 51 (69%) in the DDD-ICD group. Thirty-two of the 51 inappropriate episodes in the DDD-ICD patients resulted from intermittent atrial sensing problems that led to failure of the respective dual chamber algorithms. Nonfatal complications occurred in 6 (13%) patients in the VVI-ICD group and in 3 (6%) patients in the DDD-ICD group (P = 0.7). Conclusion: We conclude that the implanted DDD-ICD and conventional VVI-ICD are equally safe and effective for therapy of life-threatening ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Although DDD-ICDs allow better rhythm classification, the applied detection algorithms do not offer benefits in avoiding inappropriate therapies during supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N