A survey of the quality of web based information on the treatment of schizophrenia and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objective: To systematically assess the quality, accountability and readability of Internet information on the treatment of schizophrenia and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), using a standardized pro forma. Method: We analysed the 20 most highly ranked pages on the treatment of ADHD...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry Vol. 37; no. 1; pp. 85 - 92
Autores principales: Kisely S, Ong G, Takyar A
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Sage Publications Inc. Feb2003
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106098868&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106098868
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00048674
        7ZU
      jtl: Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
      issn: 00048674
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2003
      vid: 37
      iid: 1
      pid: 344
      pub: Sage Publications Inc.
      place: Thousand Oaks, California
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106098868
        106098868
        2009454284
        10.1046/j.1440-1614.2003.01107.x
        NLM12534662
        106098868
      ppf: 85
      ppct: 7
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: A survey of the quality of web based information on the treatment of schizophrenia and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
      aug:
        au:
          Kisely S
          Ong G
          Takyar A
      sug:
        subj:
          Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Therapy
          Communication
          Internet
          Medical Practice, Evidence-Based
          Questionnaires
          Schizophrenia Therapy
          Cognition
          Reading
      ab: Objective: To systematically assess the quality, accountability and readability of Internet information on the treatment of schizophrenia and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), using a standardized pro forma. Method: We analysed the 20 most highly ranked pages on the treatment of ADHD and schizophrenia, identified by five common Internet search engines. Results: There was little overlap in the sites identified by different search engines. In the case of schizophrenia, one site was identified three times and another eight sites twice; while for ADHD four sites were identified twice. Accountability (Silberg score), presentation and readability, as assessed by the Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level score, were poor. Mean Silberg, presentation and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scores were 3.2 (range 0-9) out of 9, 1.9 (range 0-4) out of 4, and 11.5 (range 6.5-12.25), respectively. There was no statistical difference in scores between the two diagnoses. Depending on the recommendation, agreement with evidence-based practice for schizophrenia ranged from only 2 to 55% (mean = 2.8 (range 0-9) out of 12), while that for ADHD was from 14 to 54% (mean = 1.6 (range 0-6) out of 6). Only 50% of the sites advised readers to clarify information with an appropriate health professional. Interrater reliability in pro forma scores for schizophrenia and ADHD was high (r = 0.96 and 0.95, respectively, p < 0.0001). Sites in the top 10% of scores were significantly more likely to be owned by an organization or have an editorial board than those in the bottom 10%. Conclusions: The Internet contains misleading information on both schizophrenia and ADHD. The methodology used in this paper could be adapted for other psychiatric conditions.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N