Multiple meanings are not necessarily a disadvantage in semantic processing: evidence from homophone effects in semantic categorisation.

The ambiguity disadvantage (slower processing of ambiguous words relative to unambiguous words) has been taken as evidence for a distributed semantic representational system like that embodied in parallel distributed processing (PDP) models. In the present study, we investigated whether semantic amb...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Language & Cognitive Processes Vol. 22; no. 3; pp. 453 - 468
Autores principales: Siakaluk P, Pexman PM, Sears CR, Owen WJ
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Psychology Press (UK) Apr2007
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:The ambiguity disadvantage (slower processing of ambiguous words relative to unambiguous words) has been taken as evidence for a distributed semantic representational system like that embodied in parallel distributed processing (PDP) models. In the present study, we investigated whether semantic ambiguity slows meaning activation, as PDP models would predict, by examining homophone effects in semantic categorisation tasks. We observed a homophone effect in a go/no-go semantic categorisation task, but not in a yes/no semantic categorisation task. Our results suggest that previously reported ambiguity effects may have been due to the decision phase of the semantic categorisation task and not to the semantic processing phase, in which case the interpretation of the ambiguity disadvantage will need to be reconsidered.