Clinical reasoning skills of speech and language therapy students...RCSLT Conference 'Realising the Vision', Belfast, 2006

Background: Difficulties experienced by novices in clinical reasoning have been well documented in many professions, especially medicine (Boshuizen and Schmidt 1992, 2000; Elstein, Shulman and Sprafka 1978; Patel and Groen 1986; Rikers, Loyens and Schmidt 2004). These studies have shown that novice...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders Vol. 42; pp. 123 - 136
Main Authors: Hoben K, Varley R, Cox R
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Wiley-Blackwell Mar2007 Supplement 1
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106152630&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106152630
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13682822
        B7U
      jtl: International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders
      issn: 13682822
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2007 Supplement 1
      vid: 42
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106152630
        106152630
        2009628341
        10.1080/13682820601171530
        NLM17454240
        106152630
      ppf: 123
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Clinical reasoning skills of speech and language therapy students...RCSLT Conference 'Realising the Vision', Belfast, 2006
      aug:
        au:
          Hoben K
          Varley R
          Cox R
        affil: Department of Human Communication Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
      sug:
        subj:
          Clinical Competence
          Diagnostic Reasoning
          Students, Speech-Language Pathology
          Coding
          Comparative Studies
          Congresses and Conferences Northern Ireland
          Descriptive Statistics
          Education, Baccalaureate
          Funding Source
          Northern Ireland
          Students, Graduate
          United Kingdom
          Human
      ab: Background: Difficulties experienced by novices in clinical reasoning have been well documented in many professions, especially medicine (Boshuizen and Schmidt 1992, 2000; Elstein, Shulman and Sprafka 1978; Patel and Groen 1986; Rikers, Loyens and Schmidt 2004). These studies have shown that novice clinicians have difficulties with both knowledge and strategy in clinical reasoning tasks. Speech and language therapy students must also learn to reason clinically, yet to date there is little evidence of how they learn to do so. Aims: In this paper, we report the clinical reasoning difficulties of a group of speech and language therapy students. We make a comparison of a subgroup of these with experienced speech and language therapists' reasoning and proposes some methods and materials to aid the development of clinical reasoning in speech and language therapy students. Methods & Procedures: Student diagnostic reasoning difficulties were analysed during the assessment of unseen cases on an electronic patient database, the Patient Assessment and Training System (PATSy http://www.patsy.ac.uk) (Lum et al. 2006). Pairs of students were videoed as they completed a one hour assessment of one of three 'virtual patients'. One pair of experienced speech and language therapists, who were not part of the project team, also completed an assessment of one of these cases under the same conditions. Screen capture was used to record all on screen activity within PATSy web pages (i.e. mouse pointer position, hyperlink and button presses, page scrolling, browser navigation interactions and data entered); Verbal comments made by participants were analysed via a seven-level coding scheme that aimed to describe the events that occur in the process of diagnostic reasoning. Outcomes & Results: Students displayed a range of competence in making an accurate diagnosis. Diagnostically accurate students showed use of specific professional vocabulary, and a greater use of firm diagnostic statements. For the diagnostically inaccurate students, typical difficulties were a failure to interpret test results and video observations, difficulty in carrying out a sequence of tests consistent with a diagnostic reasoning path, and problems in recalling and using theoretical knowledge. Conclusions and Implications: We discuss how identification of student diagnostic reasoning difficulties can inform the design of learning materials intended to address these problems.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N