Online and traditional paper-and-pencil survey administration: examining experimenter presence, sensitive material and long surveys.
The present study examined response differences between paper-and-pencil versus computer administered surveys as a function of experimenter presence, survey length, and sensitive material, including sexuality-related measures. Three conditions were employed, one traditional supervised paper-and-penc...
| Publicado en: | Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality Vol. 15; no. 3/4; pp. 147 - 156 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
University of Toronto Press
2006
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106153720&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106153720 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 11884517 1QX jtl: Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality issn: 11884517 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2006 vid: 15 iid: 3/4 pid: 678 pub: University of Toronto Press place: North York, Ontario artinfo: ui: 106153720 25455891 2009638755 106153720 ppf: 147 ppct: 9 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Online and traditional paper-and-pencil survey administration: examining experimenter presence, sensitive material and long surveys. aug: au: Wood E Nosko A Desmarais S Ross C Irvine C affil: Department of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON. sug: subj: Research Methodology Surveys Asians Black Persons Comparative Studies Descriptive Statistics Female Hispanic Americans Male Multivariate Analysis of Variance Native Americans One-Way Analysis of Variance Psychological Tests Random Assignment Repeated Measures Research Personnel Sample Size Statistical Significance Students, College White Persons Human Female Male ab: The present study examined response differences between paper-and-pencil versus computer administered surveys as a function of experimenter presence, survey length, and sensitive material, including sexuality-related measures. Three conditions were employed, one traditional supervised paper-and-pencil condition, one online computer administration condition that was supervised, and one unsupervised online computer administration condition. Missing data were greatest in the paper-andpencil condition specifically at the end of this long survey in comparison to both online computer conditions. Of the four measures assessing sensitive material, more missing data were found in the paper-and-pencil condition but only for one measure assessing sensitive content. Researcher presence did not have an impact on performance. These findings have important implications for designing and interpreting survey outcomes. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|