The effect of microbiological containment systems on dexterity.

Microbiology laboratories use containment equipment such as safety cabinets and isolators or respiratory protective equipment to protect workers against aerosol infection hazards. There is a perception among microbiologists that the use of containment equipment reduces dexterity to a point where the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene Vol. 4; no. 3; pp. 166 - 174
Autores principales: Sawyer J, Bennett A, Haines V, Elton E, Crago K, Speight S
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Mar2007
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106169346&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106169346
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        15459624
        V1L
      jtl: Journal of Occupational & Environmental Hygiene
      issn: 15459624
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Mar2007
      vid: 4
      iid: 3
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106169346
        2009511229
        10.1080/15459620601163172
        NLM17237022
        106169346
      ppf: 166
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: The effect of microbiological containment systems on dexterity.
      aug:
        au:
          Sawyer J
          Bennett A
          Haines V
          Elton E
          Crago K
          Speight S
        affil: Health Protection Agency-Biosafety, Salisbury, Wiltshire, England.
      sug:
        subj:
          Decontamination, Hazardous Materials Adverse Effects
          Gloves Adverse Effects
          Motor Skills
          Occupational Health
          Respiratory Protective Devices Adverse Effects
          Adult
          Bacteriological Techniques Equipment and Supplies
          Decontamination, Hazardous Materials Equipment and Supplies
          Environment, Controlled
          Female
          Friedman Test
          Funding Source
          Hand Physiology
          Linear Regression
          Male
          Materials Testing
          Middle Age
          One-Way Analysis of Variance
          Paired T-Tests
          Post Hoc Analysis
          T-Tests
          Two-Way Analysis of Variance
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Microbiology laboratories use containment equipment such as safety cabinets and isolators or respiratory protective equipment to protect workers against aerosol infection hazards. There is a perception among microbiologists that the use of containment equipment reduces dexterity to a point where the risks associated with using sharps are increased. Thus, in a situation where it is essential to use sharps, the use of respiratory protection is frequently the favored method of operator protection. Using three methods of manual dexterity testing, the effect of latex gloves, a positive pressure respirator, and three forms of containment equipment, (a Class II safety cabinet, a half suit, and a flexible film isolator) were tested against performance in these tests using bare hands in 10 subjects. The study was extended to additionally assess Class III cabinets using 20 subjects. With the exception of latex gloves, the personal protective equipment and containment equipment all had a statistically significant detrimental effect on manual dexterity compared with working solely with bare hands. The use of containment systems, especially barrier containment systems such as Class III cabinets and isolators, significantly reduces dexterity and may increase the chance of accidents. The use of positive pressure respirators with double gloves also affects dexterity but to a lesser extent. The use of sharps should be minimized within containment equipment. Risk assessment may be required to address the comparative risk of aerosol and needlestick infection with different agents to choose the most appropriate containment systems.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N