Airborne exposure limits for chemical and biological warfare agents: is everything set and clear?
Emergency response strategies (guidelines) for biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological terrorist events should be based on scientifically established exposure limits for all the agents or materials involved. In the case of a radiological terrorist event, emergency response guidelines (ERG) ha...
| Published in: | International Journal of Environmental Health Research Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 241 - 254 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Aug2006
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106181418&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106181418 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 09603123 57L jtl: International Journal of Environmental Health Research issn: 09603123 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Aug2006 vid: 16 iid: 4 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 106181418 2009238779 10.1080/09603120600734105 NLM16854669 106181418 ppf: 241 ppct: 13 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Airborne exposure limits for chemical and biological warfare agents: is everything set and clear? aug: au: Sabelnikov A Zhukov V Kempf CR affil: Center for Security Studies and Research, East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA sug: subj: Air Pollutants Biological Warfare Chemical Warfare Chemical Warfare Agents Emergency Medical Services Administration Emergency Medical Services Standards Decontamination, Hazardous Materials Environmental Exposure Models, Biological Practice Guidelines Public Health Risk Management ab: Emergency response strategies (guidelines) for biological, chemical, nuclear, or radiological terrorist events should be based on scientifically established exposure limits for all the agents or materials involved. In the case of a radiological terrorist event, emergency response guidelines (ERG) have been worked out. In the case of a terrorist event with the use of chemical warfare (CW) agents the situation is not that clear, though the new guidelines and clean-up values are being generated based on re-evaluation of toxicological and risk data. For biological warfare (BW) agents, such guidelines do not yet exist. In this paper the current status of airborne exposure limits (AELs) for chemical and biological warfare (CBW) agents are reviewed. Particular emphasis is put on BW agents that lack such data. An efficient, temporary solution to bridge the gap in experimental infectious data and to set provisional AELs for BW agents is suggested. It is based on mathematically generated risks of infection for BW agents grouped by their alleged ID50 values in three categories: with low, intermediate and high ID50 values. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|