Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.
In diagnostic radiology, medical-grade monochrome displays are usually recommended because of their higher luminance. Standard color displays can be used as a less expensive alternative, but have a lower luminance. The aim of the present study was to compare image quality for these two types of disp...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 20; no. 2; pp. 114 - 122 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | equations & formulas research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Jun2007
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| Sumario: | In diagnostic radiology, medical-grade monochrome displays are usually recommended because of their higher luminance. Standard color displays can be used as a less expensive alternative, but have a lower luminance. The aim of the present study was to compare image quality for these two types of displays. Images of a CDRAD contrast-detail phantom were read by four radiologists using a 2-megapixel (MP) color display (143 cd/m(2) maximum luminance) as well as 2-MP (295 cd/m(2)) and 3-MP monochrome displays. Thirty lumbar spine radiographs were also read by four radiologists using the color and the 2-MP monochrome display in a visual grading analysis (VGA). Very small differences were found between the displays when reading the CDRAD images. The VGA scores were -0.28 for the color and -0.25 for the monochrome display (p = 0.24; NS). It thus seems possible to use color displays in diagnostic radiology provided that grayscale adjustment is used. |
|---|