Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries.
Purpose: The paper reviews and analyzes the evolution of the open access (OA) publishing movement and its impact on the traditional scholarly publishing model. Procedures: A literature survey and analysis of definitions of OA, problems with the current publishing model, historical developments, fund...
| Published in: | Journal of the Medical Library Association Vol. 94; no. 3; pp. 253 - 263 |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | review Journal Article |
| Published: |
University of Pittsburgh, University Library System
Jul2006
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106207200&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106207200 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 15365050 PI8 jtl: Journal of the Medical Library Association issn: 15365050 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul2006 vid: 94 iid: 3 pid: 60406 pub: University of Pittsburgh, University Library System place: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 106207200 106207200 2009269828 NLM16888657 106207200 ppf: 253 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Open access: implications for scholarly publishing and medical libraries. aug: au: Albert KM affil: Talbot Research Library, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19111. sug: subj: Access to Information Libraries, Electronic Trends Publishing Trends Scholarship Electronic Publishing History Librarians Organizations Libraries, Electronic History PubMed Serial Publications World Wide Web ab: Purpose: The paper reviews and analyzes the evolution of the open access (OA) publishing movement and its impact on the traditional scholarly publishing model. Procedures: A literature survey and analysis of definitions of OA, problems with the current publishing model, historical developments, funding agency responses, stakeholder viewpoints, and implications for scientific libraries and publishing are performed. Findings: The Internet's transformation of information access has fueled interest in reshaping what many see as a dysfunctional, high-cost system of scholarly publishing. For years, librarians alone advocated for change, until relatively recently when interest in OA and related initiatives spread to the scientific community, governmental groups, funding agencies, publishers, and the general public. Conclusions: Most stakeholders acknowledge that change in the publishing landscape is inevitable, but heated debate continues over what form this transformation will take. The most frequently discussed remedies for the troubled current system are the 'green' road (self-archiving articles published in non-OA journals) and the 'gold' road (publishing in OA journals). Both movements will likely intensify, with a multiplicity of models and initiatives coexisting for some time. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: review Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|