Metaphoric and nonmetaphoric alternative meanings of ambiguous words: differential processing?
This study assessed the possibility that the processing of metaphoric alternative meanings of ambiguous words may be differentiated from the processing of their non-metaphoric alternative meanings. Two factors were studied in order to find a possible difference: the neural bases and the behavioral a...
| Published in: | Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology Vol. 14; no. 3; pp. 157 - 166 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Cengage Delmar Learning
2006 Sep
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106215425&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106215425 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10651438 H23 jtl: Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology issn: 10651438 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2006 Sep vid: 14 iid: 3 pid: 79059 pub: Cengage Delmar Learning place: Brandon, Mississippi artinfo: ui: 106215425 106215425 2009287903 106215425 ppf: 157 ppct: 9 formats: tig: atl: Metaphoric and nonmetaphoric alternative meanings of ambiguous words: differential processing? aug: au: Mercure E Ska B Joanette Y sug: subj: Language Processing Metaphor Psycholinguistics Adult Comparative Studies Decision Making Descriptive Statistics Female Male Post Hoc Analysis Quebec Reaction Time Semantics Students, College Two-Way Analysis of Variance Word Lists Human Adult: 19-44 years Female Male ab: This study assessed the possibility that the processing of metaphoric alternative meanings of ambiguous words may be differentiated from the processing of their non-metaphoric alternative meanings. Two factors were studied in order to find a possible difference: the neural bases and the behavioral aspects of such processing. Thirty-five participants performed a priming task in which pairs of words were related by their dominant, metaphoric alternative or nonmetaphoric alternative meanings. Stimuli were presented according to a divided visual field paradigm. Analysis did not reveal any differences in hemispheric contributions, probably because of an insufficient stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). Analysis of the behavioral results showed a difference between ambiguous words with a metaphoric alternative meaning and those with a non-metaphoric alternative meaning: for the former, the different interpretations were accessed hierarchically, while for the latter, the different interpretations were accessed in parallel. This behavioral difference in the processing of metaphoric and non-metaphoric alternative meanings suggests that these two types of ambiguous words are processed differently. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|