Validity of the cognitive behavioral driver's inventory in predicting driving outcome.
OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to (a) compare Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory (CBDI) scores for clients who passed and failed a driving evaluation and for diagnostic groups (left cerebrovascular accident [CVA], right CVA, traumatic brain injury [TBI], and cognitive decline); (b) determine sensi...
| Publicado en: | American Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 60; no. 4; pp. 420 - 428 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , |
| Formato: | research Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Occupational Therapy Association
Jul/Aug2006
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106218410&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106218410 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02729490 44I jtl: American Journal of Occupational Therapy issn: 02729490 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul/Aug2006 vid: 60 iid: 4 pid: 6680 pub: American Occupational Therapy Association place: North Bethesda, Maryland artinfo: ui: 106218410 85999458 2009235610 NLM16915872 106218410 ppf: 420 ppct: 8 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Validity of the cognitive behavioral driver's inventory in predicting driving outcome. aug: au: Bouillon L Mazer B Gelinas I affil: Occupational Therapist, Jewish Rehabilitation Hospital, 3205 Place Alton Goldbloom, Chomedey, Laval, Quebec, Canada H7V1R2 sug: subj: Automobile Driving Rehabilitation, Cognitive Competence (Legal) Chi Square Test Cognition Disorders Etiology Confidence Intervals Demography Descriptive Statistics Female Logistic Regression Male Middle Age Neuropsychological Tests Odds Ratio P-Value Prospective Studies Psychomotor Performance Reproducibility of Results Research Instruments Sensitivity and Specificity T-Tests Human Middle Aged: 45-64 years Female Male ab: OBJECTIVE: This study seeks to (a) compare Cognitive Behavioral Driver's Inventory (CBDI) scores for clients who passed and failed a driving evaluation and for diagnostic groups (left cerebrovascular accident [CVA], right CVA, traumatic brain injury [TBI], and cognitive decline); (b) determine sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the CBDI; (c) compare validity of the CBDI with other tools; and (d) identify factors associated with outcome. PARTICIPANTS: This historical cohort study included clients with neurological conditions who completed a driving evaluation. MEASURES: CBDI, Motor-Free Visual Perception Test (MVPT), Bells test, and driving results were extracted from the charts. RESULTS: Mean CBDI (p < 0.0001) and MVPT (p < 0.0001) scores were significantly worse for those failing compared to passing the driving evaluation. Sensitivity of the CBDI was 62%, specificity was 81%, positive predictive values were 73%, and negative predictive values were 71%. Results varied according to diagnostic group. CONCLUSIONS: The CBDI is not sufficiently predictive of outcome to replace a driving evaluation, and is predictive only for clients with R-CVA and TBI. Evaluation of driving should vary according to diagnosis. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|