Effects of a proximity-sensing feedback chair on head, shoulder, and trunk postures when working at a visual display terminal.

Introduction: This study was designed to identify the effects of feedback from a proximity-sensing chair on head, shoulder, and trunk postures when working at a visual display terminal (VDT). Methods: Twenty healthy adults were asked to perform VDT work, and their forward head, forward shoulder, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation Vol. 16; no. 4; pp. 631 - 638
Main Authors: Yoo W, Yi C, Kim M
Format: research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Springer Nature Dec2006
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
Description
Summary:Introduction: This study was designed to identify the effects of feedback from a proximity-sensing chair on head, shoulder, and trunk postures when working at a visual display terminal (VDT). Methods: Twenty healthy adults were asked to perform VDT work, and their forward head, forward shoulder, and trunk flexion angles were analyzed using a 3-D motion analysis system. The statistical significance of differences between without and with an auditory feedback device was tested by paired t-tests, with the significance cutoff set at [alpha]=0.05. Results: The forward head, forward shoulder, and trunk flexion angles significantly decreased during VDT work when using the proximity sensor with auditory feedback. Conclusion: We suggest that a feedback device promotes the adoption of beneficial postures, which may be effective in preventing VDT-work-related neck and upper-limb disorders.