Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Maximizing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during resuscitation may improve survival. Resuscitation protocols stack up to 3 shocks to achieve defibrillation, followed by an immediate postdefibrillation pulse check. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of rhythm rean...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Annals of Emergency Medicine Vol. 46; no. 2; pp. 132 - 142
Autores principales: Rea TD, Shah S, Kudenchuk PJ, Copass MK, Cobb LA
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. Aug2005
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106400640&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106400640
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01960644
        1WN
      jtl: Annals of Emergency Medicine
      issn: 01960644
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Aug2005
      vid: 46
      iid: 2
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106400640
        106400640
        2009018822
        10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.04.001
        NLM16046942
        106400640
      ppf: 132
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR?
      aug:
        au:
          Rea TD
          Shah S
          Kudenchuk PJ
          Copass MK
          Cobb LA
        affil: Public Health Seattle & King County, Emergency Medical Services Division, 999 Third Avenue, Suite 700, Seattle, WA 98104-4039; rea123@u.washington.edu
      sug:
        subj:
          Defibrillators, Automated External
          Resuscitation, Cardiopulmonary Methods
          Heart Arrest Therapy
          Ventricular Fibrillation Therapy
          Ventricular Fibrillation Physiopathology
          Pulse
          Electrocardiography
          Treatment Outcomes
          Heart Arrest Physiopathology
          Emergency Medical Services
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Descriptive Statistics
          Data Analysis Software
          Funding Source
          Human
      ab: STUDY OBJECTIVE: Maximizing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during resuscitation may improve survival. Resuscitation protocols stack up to 3 shocks to achieve defibrillation, followed by an immediate postdefibrillation pulse check. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of rhythm reanalyses immediately after shock, stacked shocks, and initial postshock pulse checks in relation to achieving a pulse and initiating CPR. METHODS: We conducted an observational study of patients with ventricular fibrillation treated by first-tier emergency medical services (EMS). We collected data from EMS, dispatch, and hospital records. Additionally, we analyzed automatic external defibrillator recordings to determine the proportion of cardiac arrest victims who were defibrillated and achieved a pulse according to shock number (single versus stacked shock), proportion of victims with a pulse during the initial postdefibrillation pulse check, and interval from initial shock to CPR. RESULTS: The study included 481 cardiac arrest subjects. Automatic external defibrillators terminated ventricular fibrillation with the initial shock in 83.6% (n=402) of cases. A second shock terminated ventricular fibrillation in an additional 7.5% (n=36) of cases, and a third shock terminated ventricular fibrillation in 4.8% (n=23) of cases. The initial sequence of 3 shocks failed to terminate ventricular fibrillation in 4.1% (n=20) of cases. In total, automatic external defibrillators performed 560 rhythm reanalyses during the initial shock sequence and delivered 122 'stacked' shocks. Termination of ventricular fibrillation was not synonymous with return of a pulse. The initial shock produced a pulse that was eventually detected in 21.8% (105/481) of cases. Stacked shocks produced a pulse in 10.7% (13/122) of cases. For the 24.5% (n=118) of cases in which a pulse returned, the pulse was detected during the initial postshock pulse check only 12 times, or 2.5% of all cases. The median interval from initial shock until CPR was 29 (23,41) seconds. CONCLUSION: Rhythm reanalyses, stacked shocks, and postshock pulse checks had low yield for achieving or detecting return of a pulse. CPR was not initiated until 29 seconds after the initial shock.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N