Validation of the Spin-T goniometer, a cervical range of motion device.
OBJECTIVE: To test the validity of the Spin-T goniometer for the assessment of cervical range of movement. METHODS: A linear regression analysis for paired neck movements using first a foam head model and then human subjects was performed to quantify the differences between the measurements obtained...
| Published in: | Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics Vol. 28; no. 8; pp. 604 - 610 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Elsevier B.V.
Oct2005
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106403234&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106403234 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 01614754 8GE jtl: Journal of Manipulative & Physiological Therapeutics issn: 01614754 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Oct2005 vid: 28 iid: 8 pid: 1265 pub: Elsevier B.V. place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 106403234 2009061501 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.08.015 NLM16226629 106403234 ppf: 604 ppct: 6 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Validation of the Spin-T goniometer, a cervical range of motion device. aug: au: Agarwal S Allison GT Singer KP affil: Chief Physiotherapist, Belle Vue Clinic, Kolkata, India sug: subj: Cervical Vertebrae Physiology Goniometry Evaluation Range of Motion Adult Concurrent Validity Confidence Intervals Correlation Coefficient Criterion-Related Validity Descriptive Statistics Extension External Validity Flexion Intraclass Correlation Coefficient Linear Regression Male Middle Age P-Value Repeated Measures Rotation Validation Studies Human Adult: 19-44 years Middle Aged: 45-64 years Male ab: OBJECTIVE: To test the validity of the Spin-T goniometer for the assessment of cervical range of movement. METHODS: A linear regression analysis for paired neck movements using first a foam head model and then human subjects was performed to quantify the differences between the measurements obtained from the MotionStar, a movement-tracking device, and the Spin-T. A within-subject repeated measures design using simultaneous data acquisition was completed. RESULTS: The coefficient of determination (R2) for all planes of cervical range of motion for both model and human data sets was higher than 0.99. The regression equations for the model data showed no significant (P > .05) intercept for flexion-extension and lateral rotation. Human data showed statistically significant intercept for flexion-extension (mean, -0.52 degrees) and lateral flexion (mean, 0.81 degrees) at P < .05. CONCLUSION: This study quantifies the difference between the MotionStar and the Spin-T goniometer and documents the systematic error between the measures. Where the error reached statistical significance, the magnitude of the error was very small (< 1.5 degrees). The results of this study suggest that the Spin-T goniometer may be used as a valid measuring instrument for cervical range of movement. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|