Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers.
Patients with cochlear implants have the ability to exercise auditory control over their own speech production and over the speech of others, which is important for the development of speech control. In the present investigation three groups of 10 subjects were compared. The groups comprised: (1) co...
| Published in: | Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics Vol. 20; no. 2/3; pp. 211 - 218 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Ltd
Apr/May2006
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106440896&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106440896 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02699206 B6X jtl: Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics issn: 02699206 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Apr/May2006 vid: 20 iid: 2/3 pid: 377 pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania artinfo: ui: 106440896 2009162440 10.1080/02699200400027015 NLM16428239 106440896 ppf: 211 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Voice and pronunciation of cochlear implant speakers. aug: au: Horga D Liker M affil: Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Phonetics, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia; damir.horga@ffzg.hr sug: subj: Cochlear Implant In Infancy and Childhood Speech Production Measurement Voice Quality Adolescence Case Control Studies Child Comparative Studies Descriptive Statistics Hearing Aids Questionnaires Speech Acoustics Funding Source Human Adolescent: 13-18 years Child: 6-12 years ab: Patients with cochlear implants have the ability to exercise auditory control over their own speech production and over the speech of others, which is important for the development of speech control. In the present investigation three groups of 10 subjects were compared. The groups comprised: (1) cochlear implant users, (2) profoundly deaf using traditional hearing aids, and (3) hearing controls. The subjects in three groups were matched in age. While repeating after a model the subjects were recorded and the following linguistic voice variables were analysed: (1) vowel formant space, (2) voice vs. voiceless difference, (3) closure duration and VOT, (4) word accent production, (5) sentence stress production, (6) voice quality, (7) pronunciation quality. Acoustic analysis and perceptual assessment by phoneticians showed that in great majority of variables, subjects with cochlear implants performed better than the profoundly deaf subjects with traditional hearing-aids. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|