DNA paternity tests: a comparative analysis of the US and Australia.

There are five times as many DNA paternity tests per capita in the US than Australia. This is not a consequence of 'technological lag', but a combination of political, cultural and economic factors. First, government agencies in the US enforce relatively more tests, at least partly because of legisl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Sociology Review Vol. 15; no. 1; pp. 84 - 96
Autor principal: Gilding M
Formato: Journal Article
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Ltd Apr2006
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106462532&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106462532
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        14461242
        1H4V
      jtl: Health Sociology Review
      issn: 14461242
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2006
      vid: 15
      iid: 1
      pid: 377
      pub: Taylor & Francis Ltd
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106462532
        106462532
        2009176760
        10.5172/hesr.2006.15.1.84
        106462532
      ppf: 84
      ppct: 12
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: DNA paternity tests: a comparative analysis of the US and Australia.
      aug:
        au: Gilding M
        affil: Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia
      sug:
        subj:
          Diffusion of Innovation
          Genetic Screening
          Paternity
          Australia
          Family
          Government
          Industry
          United States
      ab: There are five times as many DNA paternity tests per capita in the US than Australia. This is not a consequence of 'technological lag', but a combination of political, cultural and economic factors. First, government agencies in the US enforce relatively more tests, at least partly because of legislative differences in the presumption of paternity. Second, government agencies in the US enforce relatively more tests partly on account of differences in family structure. More specifically, in the US there are relatively more nonmarital births, and nonmarital births are less likely to occur in the context of informal cohabitation where paternity is not in dispute. Third, differences in industry organisation account for more DNA paternity tests per capita in the US. Unlike the Australian market, the US market is characteristically divided between tests done for government agencies and those for private individuals. In turn, the private market in the US is more competitive. In particular, brokerage is pervasive, leading to more proactive marketing through the Internet, day-time television and other avenues. The study highlights the importance of social dynamics in the uptake of new technologies.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype: Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N