Performance investigation of a head-operated device and expanded membrane cursor keys in a target acquisition task.
This study investigated the relative performance of two computer input devices appropriate for persons sharing similar motor challenges: a head operated device and expanded membrane cursor keys. Performance was evaluated in the context of a Fitts' law target acquisition task. For this initial phase...
| Published in: | Technology & Disability Vol. 17; no. 3; pp. 173 - 184 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
Sage Publications Inc.
2005
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106546683&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106546683 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 10554181 3QS jtl: Technology & Disability issn: 10554181 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: 2005 vid: 17 iid: 3 pid: 344 pub: Sage Publications Inc. place: Thousand Oaks, California artinfo: ui: 106546683 106546683 2009043288 10.3233/tad-2005-17305 106546683 ppf: 173 ppct: 11 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Performance investigation of a head-operated device and expanded membrane cursor keys in a target acquisition task. aug: au: Capilouto GJ Higginbotham DJ McClenaghan B Williams HG Dickerson J affil: College of Health Sciences, 900 S. Limestone, Room 120 J, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40536-0200; gjcapi2@uky.edu sug: subj: Assistive Technology Devices Computer Input Devices Persons with Disabilities Equipment Design Reaction Time Task Performance and Analysis Comparative Studies Data Analysis Software Post Hoc Analysis Human ab: This study investigated the relative performance of two computer input devices appropriate for persons sharing similar motor challenges: a head operated device and expanded membrane cursor keys. Performance was evaluated in the context of a Fitts' law target acquisition task. For this initial phase of investigation, subjects without disabilities were selected to focus on performance differences inherent in the devices and their operation. Results indicated that the total time to acquire a target was significantly faster for the head device than for the expanded cursor keys. For typical young adults, the head-operated device required less time to reach asymptote performance by simplifying the cognitive demands for device operation. These results suggest that for persons unable to isolate their fingers, head-operated controls may offer advantages over input devices operated by the upper extremities. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|