Reliability and validity of the test of visual-perceptual skills (non-motor) -- revised for Chinese preschoolers.

OBJECTIVE. The reliability and validity of the Test of Visual-Perceptual Skills (Non-Motor)-Revised (TVPS-R) were examined for its usefulness on Hong Kong Chinese preschoolers.METHOD. Content validity was evaluated by six experts. Test-retest reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:American Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 59; no. 4; pp. 369 - 377
Autores principales: Chan PLC, Chow SMK
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Occupational Therapy Association Jul/Aug2005
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE. The reliability and validity of the Test of Visual-Perceptual Skills (Non-Motor)-Revised (TVPS-R) were examined for its usefulness on Hong Kong Chinese preschoolers.METHOD. Content validity was evaluated by six experts. Test-retest reliability, construct validity, and criterion validity were examined on 66 typically developing preschoolers while concurrent validity was examined on these preschoolers plus 52 preschoolers with visual-perception difficulties.RESULTS. Test-retest reliability was high for the total score (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] =.88), but not for all subtests (ICC ranged .38 to .77) or for individual items (mean kappa = 0.32). The standard error of measurement (SEM;1.53) and internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = .90) were satisfactory. Evidence supporting the test's validity included a significant developmental trend (F= 4.99, p < .001), a lack of gender bias (F= .04, p = .84), and positive known-group differentiation (Wilks's lambda = 52.42, p < .001). The correlation between the Motor-Free Visual-Perceptual Test-Revised composite score and the TVPS-R composite was moderate at r= .60.CONCLUSIONS. When based on the total scores, the TVPS-R was reliable and valid. The use of subtest scores and item scores for decision making or treatment planning is not recommended.