The interrater reliability among physical therapists newly trained in a classification system for acute low back pain.

Study Design: A prospective methodological interrater reliability study. Objectives: To calculate the interrater reliability among clinicians newly trained in a classification system for acute low back pain and to determine the level of agreement at key junctures within the classification algorithm....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Vol. 34; no. 8; pp. 430 - 440
Autores principales: Heiss DG, Fitch DS, Fritz JM, Sanchez WJ, Roberts KE, Buford JA
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: JOSPT, Inc. d/b/a Movement Science Media 2004 Aug
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106556437&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106556437
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01906011
        4CA
      jtl: Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
      issn: 01906011
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2004 Aug
      vid: 34
      iid: 8
      pid: 45541
      pub: JOSPT, Inc. d/b/a Movement Science Media
      place: Alexandria, Virginia
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106556437
        106556437
        2005011622
        NLM15373006
        106556437
      ppf: 430
      ppct: 10
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: The interrater reliability among physical therapists newly trained in a classification system for acute low back pain.
      aug:
        au:
          Heiss DG
          Fitch DS
          Fritz JM
          Sanchez WJ
          Roberts KE
          Buford JA
        affil: Associate Professor, Physical Therapy Division, School of Allied Medical Professions, College of Medicine and Public Health, Ohio State University, 516N Atwell Hall, 1583 Perry Street, Columbus, OH 43210-1234; heiss.8@osu.edu
      sug:
        subj:
          Low Back Pain Classification
          Clinical Assessment Tools
          Instrument Validation
          Interrater Reliability
          Reliability and Validity
          Algorithms
          Physical Therapists
          kappa Statistic
          Outpatients
          Ambulatory Care
          Rehabilitation Centers
          Ohio
          Functional Assessment
          Male
          Female
          Pain Measurement
          Paired T-Tests
          Intraclass Correlation Coefficient
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Descriptive Statistics
          Funding Source
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Male
          Female
      ab: Study Design: A prospective methodological interrater reliability study. Objectives: To calculate the interrater reliability among clinicians newly trained in a classification system for acute low back pain and to determine the level of agreement at key junctures within the classification algorithm. Background: The utility of a classification system for patients with low back pain depends on its reliability and generalizability. To be practical, clinicians must be able to apply the system after a reasonable amount of training. Identifying key points in the classification algorithm where disagreement occurs can lead to better operational definitions. Methods: Four physical therapists read an article and attended a 1-day training session in the classification system. Randomly paired therapists classified patients referred for treatment of acute low back pain and noted decisions at key junctures in the system algorithm. Results: Forty-five patients were classified. Repeated examinations did not increase the patient's pain (P>.05). For 3 out of the 4 therapists, the interrater reliability showed a kappa value of 0.45. The fourth therapist, excluded from the overall analysis, exhibited a bias towards the immobilization classification. Among the 3 therapists, major disagreement occurred with the determination of symmetry with trunk side bending and the effects of repeated movements. Conclusions: Three out of 4 clinicians newly trained in the system showed moderate reliability. The reliability was slight when the fourth therapist was included. Refinement of the operational definitions and criteria for determining lumbar capsular patterns are needed. One day of training is probably not adequate for all therapists, especially for those biased towards specific low back pain syndromes.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N