Comparing methods of measurement for detecting drug-induced changes in the QT interval: implications for thoroughly conducted ECG studies.

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the reproducibility and sensitivity of four commonly used methods for QT interval assessment when applied to ECG data obtained after infusion of ibutilide.Methods: Four methods were compared: (1) 12-lead simultaneous ECG (12-SIM), (2) lead II ECG (LEA...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology Vol. 9; no. 2; pp. 166 - 175
Autores principales: Azie NE, Adams G, Darpo B, Francom SF, Polasek EC, Wisser JM, Fleishaker JC, Azie, Nkechi E, Adams, Gregory, Darpo, Borje, Francom, Steven F, Polasek, Emery C, Wisser, Joy M, Fleishaker, Joseph C
Formato: algorithm research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Apr2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106575844&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106575844
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        1082720X
        GSF
      jtl: Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology
      issn: 1082720X
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Apr2004
      vid: 9
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106575844
        106575844
        NLM15084215
        2005031460
        NLM15084215
        106575844
      ppf: 166
      ppct: 9
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Comparing methods of measurement for detecting drug-induced changes in the QT interval: implications for thoroughly conducted ECG studies.
      aug:
        au:
          Azie NE
          Adams G
          Darpo B
          Francom SF
          Polasek EC
          Wisser JM
          Fleishaker JC
          Azie, Nkechi E
          Adams, Gregory
          Darpo, Borje
          Francom, Steven F
          Polasek, Emery C
          Wisser, Joy M
          Fleishaker, Joseph C
        affil: Clinical Pharmacology, Pfizer Ltd., Kalamazoo, MI, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Antiarrhythmia Agents Adverse Effects
          Heart Rate Variability
          Adult
          Comparative Studies
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Descriptive Statistics
          Electrocardiography
          Female
          Male
          Michigan
          Random Assignment
          Software
          Time Factors
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: Background: The aim of this study was to compare the reproducibility and sensitivity of four commonly used methods for QT interval assessment when applied to ECG data obtained after infusion of ibutilide.Methods: Four methods were compared: (1) 12-lead simultaneous ECG (12-SIM), (2) lead II ECG (LEAD II), both measured on a digitizing board, (3) 3-LEAD ECG using a manual tangential method, and (4) a computer-based, proprietary algorithm, 12SL trade mark ECG Analysis software (AUT). QT intervals were measured in 10 healthy volunteers at multiple time points during 24 hours at baseline and after single intravenous doses of ibutilide 0.25 and 0.5 mg. Changes in QT interval from baseline were calculated and compared across ECG methods, using Bland-Altman plots. Variability was studied using a mixed linear model.Results: Baseline QT values differed between methods (range 376-395 ms), mainly based on the number of leads incorporated into the measurement, with LEAD II and 3-LEAD providing the shortest intervals. The 3-LEAD generated the largest QT change from baseline, whereas LEAD II and 12-SIM generated essentially identical result within narrow limits of agreement (0.4 ms mean difference, 95% confidence interval +/- 20.5 ms). Variability with AUT (standard deviation 15.8 ms for within-subject values) was clearly larger than with 3-LEAD, LEAD II, and 12-SIM (9.6, 10.0, and 11.3 ms).Conclusion: This study demonstrated significant differences among four commonly used methods for QT interval measurement after pharmacological prolongation of cardiac repolarization. Observed large differences in variability of measurements will have a substantial impact on the sample size required to detect QT prolongation in the range that is currently advised in regulatory guidance.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        algorithm
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N