A randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation -- impact of a decision aid on treatment outcomes and costs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a decision aid for menorrhagia on treatment outcomes and costs over a 12-month follow-up. DESIGN: Randomized trial and pre-trial prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Gynaecology outpatient clinics in 14 Finnish hospitals, 363 (randomized trial) pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Health Expectations Vol. 7; no. 4; pp. 327 - 338
Autores principales: Vuorma S, Teperi J, Aalto A, Hurskainen R, Kujansuu E, Rissanen P
Formato: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Dec2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106579172&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106579172
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        13696513
        EVY
      jtl: Health Expectations
      issn: 13696513
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Dec2004
      vid: 7
      iid: 4
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106579172
        106579172
        2005034821
        10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00297.x
        NLM15544685
        106579172
      ppf: 327
      ppct: 11
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: A randomized trial among women with heavy menstruation -- impact of a decision aid on treatment outcomes and costs.
      aug:
        au:
          Vuorma S
          Teperi J
          Aalto A
          Hurskainen R
          Kujansuu E
          Rissanen P
        affil: Researcher STAKES, PO Box 220 FIN-00531 Helsinki, Finland; sirkku.vuorma@welho.com
      sug:
        subj:
          Decision Making, Patient
          Menorrhagia Economics
          Menorrhagia Therapy
          Treatment Outcomes
          Adult
          Chi Square Test
          Clinical Trials
          Female
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Funding Source
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Middle Age
          P-Value
          Patient Satisfaction
          Prospective Studies
          Psychological Well-Being
          Quality of Life
          Questionnaires
          Research Instruments
          Scales
          T-Tests
          Two-Tailed Test
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
      ab: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a decision aid for menorrhagia on treatment outcomes and costs over a 12-month follow-up. DESIGN: Randomized trial and pre-trial prospective cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Gynaecology outpatient clinics in 14 Finnish hospitals, 363 (randomized trial) plus 206 (cohort study) patients with menorrhagia. INTERVENTION: A decision aid booklet explaining menorrhagia and treatment options, mailed to patients before their first clinic appointment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Health related quality of life, psychological well-being, menstrual symptoms, satisfaction with treatment outcome, use and cost of health care services. RESULTS: All study groups experienced overall improvement in health-related quality of life, anxiety, and psychosomatic and menstrual symptoms, but not in sexual life. Treatment in the intervention group was more active than in the control group, with more frequent course of medication and less undecided treatments. However, there were no marked disparities in health outcomes, satisfaction with treatment outcome and costs. Total costs (including productivity loss) per woman because of menorrhagia over the 12-month follow-up were 2760 and 3094 in the intervention and control group, respectively (P = 0.1). The pre-trial group also had a significantly lower rate of uterus saving surgery compared with the control group, but no difference in costs because of menorrhagia treatment. CONCLUSION: Despite some differences in treatment courses, a decision aid for menorrhagia in booklet form did not increase the use of health services or treatment costs, nor had it impact on health outcomes or satisfaction with outcome of treatment.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N