A digital processing strategy to optimize hearing aid outputs directly.

A new amplification strategy (ADRO), based on 64 independently operating channels, was compared with a nine-channel wide dynamic range compression strategy (WDRC). Open-platform in-the-ear hearing instruments were configured either with ADRO or the manufacturer's WDRC strategy. Twenty-two subjects w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Vol. 15; no. 10; pp. 716 - 729
Autores principales: Blamey PJ, Martin LFA, Fiket HJ
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc. Nov/Dec2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106594542&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106594542
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        10500545
        9OC
      jtl: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
      issn: 10500545
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Nov/Dec2004
      vid: 15
      iid: 10
      pid: 2811
      pub: Thieme Medical Publishing Inc.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106594542
        15829388
        2005051064
        10.3766/jaaa.15.10.6
        NLM15646669
        106594542
      ppf: 716
      ppct: 13
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: A digital processing strategy to optimize hearing aid outputs directly.
      aug:
        au:
          Blamey PJ
          Martin LFA
          Fiket HJ
        affil: Cooperative Research Centre for Cochlear Implant and Hearing Aid Innovation
      sug:
        subj:
          Hearing Aids Evaluation
          Signal Processing, Computer Assisted
          Adult
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Analysis of Variance
          Australia
          Confidence Intervals
          Descriptive Statistics
          Female
          Hearing Aid Fitting
          Male
          Middle Age
          Product Evaluation
          Repeated Measures
          Single-Blind Studies
          Speech Discrimination Tests
          Word Lists
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Female
          Male
      ab: A new amplification strategy (ADRO), based on 64 independently operating channels, was compared with a nine-channel wide dynamic range compression strategy (WDRC). Open-platform in-the-ear hearing instruments were configured either with ADRO or the manufacturer's WDRC strategy. Twenty-two subjects with mild to moderate hearing loss took home the ADRO or WDRC hearing aids. After three weeks' acclimatization, the aids were evaluated using monosyllables in quiet at 50 to 65 dB SPL and sentences in eight-talker babble. The acclimatization and evaluation were repeated in the second phase of the balanced reverse-block blind experimental design. The ADRO program showed a statistically significant mean advantage of 7.85% word score (95% confidence interval 3.19% to 12.51%; p = 0.002) and 6.41% phoneme score for the monosyllables in quiet (95% confidence interval 2.03% to 10.79%; p = 0.006). A statistically significant advantage of 7.25% was also found for the ADRO program in background noise (95% confidence interval 1.95% to 12.55%; p = 0.010). The results are consistent with earlier data for listeners with moderate to severe hearing loss.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N