Outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain.
Outcomes tracking provides a systematic method of monitoring treatment effectiveness and efficiency. A familiarity with outcome measures for the patient with low back pain is very important for clinicians working in orthopaedic settings, where patients with lumbar pain are prevalent. The clinician m...
| Publicado en: | Orthopaedic Nursing Vol. 24; no. 1; pp. 14 - 24 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | case study tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Jan/Feb2005
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106609646&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106609646 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 07446020 39H jtl: Orthopaedic Nursing issn: 07446020 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jan/Feb2005 vid: 24 iid: 1 pid: 5086 pub: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins place: Baltimore, Maryland artinfo: ui: 106609646 106609646 2005067811 10.1097/00006416-200501000-00007 NLM15722968 106609646 ppf: 14 ppct: 10 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Outcomes measurement for patients with low back pain. aug: au: Resnik L Dobrykowski E affil: Brown University, Providence, RI sug: subj: Clinical Assessment Tools Low Back Pain Outcome Assessment Clinical Assessment Tools Classification Disability Evaluation Female Job Re-Entry Middle Age Pain Measurement Quality of Life Questionnaires Reliability Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36) Validity Middle Aged: 45-64 years Female ab: Outcomes tracking provides a systematic method of monitoring treatment effectiveness and efficiency. A familiarity with outcome measures for the patient with low back pain is very important for clinicians working in orthopaedic settings, where patients with lumbar pain are prevalent. The clinician must be able to evaluate and choose appropriate measurement tools, and understand the clinical meaning of measurements to successfully employ these instruments. The purposes of this article are to review measurement instruments and to offer practical guidelines for selection and use of outcome measures for this population. The reliability, validity, sensitivity to change, and utility of common outcome measures are discussed. An overview of generic, disease-specific, and patient-specific tools is provided, with specific commentary on the use of the SF-36, SF-12, Oswestry, Roland Morris, and patient-specific tools. Practical guidelines for utilizing outcome measures in clinical practice and the overall benefits of outcomes tracking are highlighted. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: case study tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|