Deaf signers who know Japanese remember words and numbers more effectively than deaf signers who know English.
Deaf people have difficulty reading and remembering English script because of its sound-based orthography. Logographs (e.g., kanji, Arabic numerals) should not pose the same challenge because they are based on meaning, not sound. Little research has been conducted to test this theory's validity cros...
| Publicado en: | American Annals of the Deaf Vol. 149; no. 1; pp. 39 - 46 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , |
| Formato: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
American Annals of the Deaf
Spring2004
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106676867&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106676867 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 0002726X AOD jtl: American Annals of the Deaf issn: 0002726X maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Spring2004 vid: 149 iid: 1 pid: 2466 pub: American Annals of the Deaf place: Washington, District of Columbia artinfo: ui: 106676867 106676867 2004207569 10.1353/aad.2004.0010 NLM15332465 106676867 ppf: 39 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Deaf signers who know Japanese remember words and numbers more effectively than deaf signers who know English. aug: au: Flaherty M Moran A affil: College Lecturer, Department of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, 4, Ireland; mary.flaherty@ucd.ie sug: subj: Deafness Japanese Persons Language Processing Memory Adult Case Control Studies Comparative Studies Funding Source Ireland Ethnology Japan Ethnology Post Hoc Analysis Reading T-Tests United States Ethnology Visual Perception Word Lists Human Adult: 19-44 years ab: Deaf people have difficulty reading and remembering English script because of its sound-based orthography. Logographs (e.g., kanji, Arabic numerals) should not pose the same challenge because they are based on meaning, not sound. Little research has been conducted to test this theory's validity cross-culturally. The present study was an attempt to do just that. The first of two experiments tested immediate memory spans for word sequences of 20 hearing Irish, 20 prelingually deaf Americans, 20 hearing Japanese, and 20 prelingually deaf Japanese. For English words, deaf participants showed shorter memory spans than hearing participants, but memory spans were similar for deaf and hearing participants for words in kanji, the logographic system for Japanese writing. The second experiment tested memory span for Arabic numerals, with the same participants. Deaf English-readers showed shorter memory spans than their hearing counterparts, but deaf and hearing Japanese performed similarly. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|