Socioeconomic status, service patterns, and perceptions of care among survivors of acute myocardial infarction in Canada.

Context: Some have argued that Canada's uniquely restrictive approach to private health insurance keeps the socioeconomic elite inside the public system so that their demands and influence elevate the standard of service for all Canadian citizens. The extent to which this theory is a valid represent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association Vol. 291; no. 9; pp. 1100 - 1108
Autores principales: Alter DA, Iron K, Austin PC, Naylor CD, Alter, David A, Iron, Karey, Austin, Peter C, Naylor, C David
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: American Medical Association 3/3/2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106749051&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106749051
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00987484
        AMA
      jtl: JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
      issn: 00987484
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 3/3/2004
      vid: 291
      iid: 9
      pid: 30
      pub: American Medical Association
      place: Chicago, Illinois
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106749051
        NLM14996779
        2004099362
        10.1001/jama.291.9.1100
        NLM14996779
        106749051
      ppf: 1100
      ppct: 8
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Socioeconomic status, service patterns, and perceptions of care among survivors of acute myocardial infarction in Canada.
      aug:
        au:
          Alter DA
          Iron K
          Austin PC
          Naylor CD
          Alter, David A
          Iron, Karey
          Austin, Peter C
          Naylor, C David
        affil: Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Health Services Accessibility
          Myocardial Infarction Therapy
          Patient Satisfaction
          Quality of Health Care
          Adult
          Aged
          Canada
          Chi Square Test
          Health Resource Utilization
          Income
          Interviews
          Logistic Regression
          Mantel-Haenszel Test
          Middle Age
          National Health Programs
          Nonexperimental Studies
          Odds Ratio
          Ontario
          Prospective Studies
          Questionnaires
          Scales
          Socioeconomic Factors
          Funding Source
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: Context: Some have argued that Canada's uniquely restrictive approach to private health insurance keeps the socioeconomic elite inside the public system so that their demands and influence elevate the standard of service for all Canadian citizens. The extent to which this theory is a valid representation of Canadian health care is unknown.Objectives: To explore how patients with acute myocardial infarction from different socioeconomic backgrounds perceive their care in Canada's universal health care system and to correlate patients' backgrounds and perceptions with actual care received.Design, Setting, and Patients: Prospective observational cohort study with follow-up telephone interviews of 2256 patients 30 days following acute myocardial infarction discharged from 53 hospitals across Ontario, Canada, between December 1999 and June 2002.Main Outcome Measures: Postdischarge use of cardiac specialty services; satisfaction with care; willingness to pay directly for faster service or more choice; and mortality according to income and education, adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, clinical factors, onsite angiography capacity at the admitting hospital, and rural-urban residence.Results: Compared with patients in lower socioeconomic strata, more affluent or better educated patients were more likely to undergo coronary angiography (67.8% vs 52.8%; P<.001), receive cardiac rehabilitation (43.9% vs 25.6%; P<.001), or be followed up by a cardiologist (56.7% vs 47.8%; P<.001). Socioeconomic differences in cardiac care persisted after adjustment for confounders. Despite receiving more specialized services, patients with higher socioeconomic status were more likely to be dissatisfied with their access to specialty care (adjusted RR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.20-3.32) and to favor out-of-pocket payments for quicker access to a wider selection of treatment options (30% vs 15% for patients with household incomes of Can 60 000 dollars or higher vs less than Can 30 000 dollars, respectively; P<.001). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, socioeconomic status was not significantly associated with mortality at 1 year following hospitalization for myocardial infarction.Conclusions: Compared with those with lower incomes or less education, upper middle-class Canadians gain preferential access to services within the publicly funded health care system yet remain more likely to favor supplemental coverage or direct purchase of services.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N