Cost and cost-effectiveness of standard methadone maintenance treatment compared to enriched 180-day methadone detoxification.

AIMS: To compare the cost and cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment and 180-day methadone detoxification enriched with psychosocial services. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study conducted from May 1995 to April 1999. SETTING: Research clinic in an established drug treatment program....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Addiction Vol. 99; no. 6; pp. 718 - 727
Autores principales: Masson CL, Barnett PG, Sees KL, Delucchi KL, Rosen A, Wong W, Hall SM
Formato: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Jun2004
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106761660&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106761660
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        09652140
        AIO
      jtl: Addiction
      issn: 09652140
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2004
      vid: 99
      iid: 6
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106761660
        106761660
        2004130125
        10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00728.x
        NLM15139870
        106761660
      ppf: 718
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Cost and cost-effectiveness of standard methadone maintenance treatment compared to enriched 180-day methadone detoxification.
      aug:
        au:
          Masson CL
          Barnett PG
          Sees KL
          Delucchi KL
          Rosen A
          Wong W
          Hall SM
        affil: Department of Psychiatry, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, Bldg., 20, Suite 2100, San Francisco, CA 94110; masson@itsa.ucsf.edu
      sug:
        subj:
          Methadone Economics
          Substance Use Rehabilitation Programs Economics
          Substance Use Rehabilitation Programs Methods
          Clinical Trials
          Confidence Intervals
          Costs and Cost Analysis
          Mann-Whitney U Test
          Random Assignment
          Research Instruments
          Support, Psychosocial
          T-Tests
          Human
      ab: AIMS: To compare the cost and cost-effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment and 180-day methadone detoxification enriched with psychosocial services. DESIGN: Randomized controlled study conducted from May 1995 to April 1999. SETTING: Research clinic in an established drug treatment program. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and seventy-nine adults with diagnosed opioid dependence. Intervention Patients were randomized to methadone maintenance (n = 91), which required monthly 1 hour/week of psychosocial therapy during the first 6 months or 180-day detoxification (n = 88), which required 3 hours/week of psychosocial therapy and 14 education sessions during the first 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: Total health-care costs and self-reported injection drug use. A two-state Markov model was used to estimate quality-adjusted years of survival. Findings Methadone maintenance produced significantly greater reductions in illicit opioid use than 180-day detoxification during the last 6 months of treatment. Total health-care costs were greater for maintenance than detoxification treatment ($7564 versus $6687; P < 0.001). Although study costs were significantly higher for methadone maintenance than detoxification patients ($4739 versus $2855, P < 0.001), detoxification patients incurred significantly higher costs for substance abuse and mental health care received outside the study. Methadone maintenance may provide a modest survival advantage compared with detoxification. The cost per life-year gained is $16 967. Sensitivity analysis revealed a cost-effectiveness ratio of less than $20 000 per quality-adjusted life-year over a wide range of modeling assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with enriched detoxification services, methadone maintenance is more effective than enriched detoxification services with a cost-effectiveness ratio within the range of many accepted medical interventions and may provide a survival advantage. Results provide additional support for the use of sustained methadone therapy as opposed to detoxification for treating opioid addiction.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N