Emergency medicine-trained physicians are proficient in the insertion of transvenous pacemakers.

Study Objective: The insertion and management of a temporary transvenous pacemaker can be a lifesaving procedure in the emergency department setting. We compare the success and complication rates associated with temporary transvenous pacemaker insertion between physicians trained in either emergency...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Annals of Emergency Medicine Vol. 43; no. 4; pp. 469 - 475
Autores principales: Birkhahn RH, Gaeta TJ, Tloczkowski J, Mundy T, Sharma M, Bove J, Briggs WM, Birkhahn, Robert H, Gaeta, Theodore J, Tloczkowski, John, Mundy, Todd, Sharma, Manish, Bove, Joseph, Briggs, William M
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2004 Apr
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106779061&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106779061
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01960644
        1WN
      jtl: Annals of Emergency Medicine
      issn: 01960644
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 2004 Apr
      vid: 43
      iid: 4
      pid: 467
      pub: Elsevier B.V.
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106779061
        106779061
        NLM15039689
        2004158209
        10.1016/j.annemergmed.2003.09.019
        NLM15039689
        106779061
      ppf: 469
      ppct: 6
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Emergency medicine-trained physicians are proficient in the insertion of transvenous pacemakers.
      aug:
        au:
          Birkhahn RH
          Gaeta TJ
          Tloczkowski J
          Mundy T
          Sharma M
          Bove J
          Briggs WM
          Birkhahn, Robert H
          Gaeta, Theodore J
          Tloczkowski, John
          Mundy, Todd
          Sharma, Manish
          Bove, Joseph
          Briggs, William M
        affil: Department of Emergency Medicine, New York Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, NY 11215, USA
      sug:
        subj:
          Pacemaker, Artificial
          Emergency Medicine
          Cardiology
          Clinical Competence
          Pacemaker, Artificial Adverse Effects
          Record Review
          Retrospective Design
          Interrater Reliability
          kappa Statistic
          Confidence Intervals
          Adult
          Middle Age
          Aged
          Aged, 80 and Over
          Female
          Male
          Human
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
          Aged: 65+ years
          Aged, 80 & over
          Female
          Male
      ab: Study Objective: The insertion and management of a temporary transvenous pacemaker can be a lifesaving procedure in the emergency department setting. We compare the success and complication rates associated with temporary transvenous pacemaker insertion between physicians trained in either emergency medicine or cardiology.Methods: This was a retrospective medical record review of all patients with a billing code for temporary transvenous pacemaker insertion at our institution between July 1999 and December 2002. Patients were excluded if the temporary transvenous pacemaker was not supervised by an attending physician or was placed under fluoroscopy or if the indication for pacing was asystole. Cases were reviewed by 2 physicians certified in emergency medicine and categorized by the specialty training of the attending physician providing direct supervision.Results: During the review period, 10 emergency medicine faculty and 8 cardiologists directly supervised 141 of the 158 temporary transvenous pacemaker insertions in 154 patients. Twenty-four were placed for asystole, 4 were placed under fluoroscopy, and 13 were placed without direct attending supervision, leaving a total of 117 cases (30 emergency medicine, 87 cardiology) for review. The procedure was successful 97% (95% confidence interval [CI] 90% to 100%) of the time for emergency medicine faculty and 95% (95% CI 91% to 100%) of the time for cardiology faculty. Complications were seen in 23% (95% CI 7% to 39%) of the temporary transvenous pacemakers inserted by emergency medicine attending physicians and 20% (95% CI 11% to 28%) of the temporary transvenous pacemakers inserted by cardiologists. There was no statistical difference in errors between the specialties, and no complication resulted in death or prolonged disability.Conclusion: Physicians trained in emergency medicine perform temporary transvenous pacemaker insertions in the acute care setting with a proficiency similar to that of their counterparts in cardiology.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N