Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Background: Endarterectomy reduces risk of stroke in certain patients with recently symptomatic internal carotid stenosis. However, investigators have made different recommendations about the degree of stenosis above which surgery is effective, partly because of differences between trials in the met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lancet Vol. 361; no. 9352; pp. 107 - 117
Main Authors: Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Fox AJ, Taylor DW, Mayberg MR, Warlow CP, Barnett HJM, Rothwell, P M, Eliasziw, M, Gutnikov, S A, Fox, A J, Taylor, D W, Mayberg, M R, Warlow, C P, Barnett, H J M
Format: diagnostic images pictorial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Lancet 1/11/2003
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106861543&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106861543
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01406736
        LAN
      jtl: Lancet
      issn: 01406736
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 1/11/2003
      vid: 361
      iid: 9352
      pid: 1297
      pub: Lancet
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106861543
        106861543
        NLM12531577
        2003108483
        10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12228-3
        NLM12531577
        106861543
      ppf: 107
      ppct: 10
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis.
      aug:
        au:
          Rothwell PM
          Eliasziw M
          Gutnikov SA
          Fox AJ
          Taylor DW
          Mayberg MR
          Warlow CP
          Barnett HJM
          Rothwell, P M
          Eliasziw, M
          Gutnikov, S A
          Fox, A J
          Taylor, D W
          Mayberg, M R
          Warlow, C P
          Barnett, H J M
        affil: Stroke Prevention Research Unit, University Department of Clinical Neurology, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK
      sug:
        subj:
          Carotid Stenosis Surgery
          Endarterectomy
          Stroke Mortality
          Aged
          Carotid Stenosis Physiopathology
          Carotid Stenosis Radiography
          Confidence Intervals
          Funding Source
          Human
          Kaplan-Meier Estimator
          Meta Analysis
          Middle Age
          Randomized Controlled Trials
          Relative Risk
          Survival Analysis
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: Background: Endarterectomy reduces risk of stroke in certain patients with recently symptomatic internal carotid stenosis. However, investigators have made different recommendations about the degree of stenosis above which surgery is effective, partly because of differences between trials in the methods of measurement of stenosis. To accurately assess the overall effect of surgery, and to increase power for secondary analyses, we pooled trial data and reassessed carotid angiograms.Methods: We pooled data from the European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST), North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial, and Veterans Affairs trial 309 from the original electronic data files. Outcome events were re-defined, if necessary, to achieve comparability. Pre-randomisation carotid angiograms from ECST were re-measured by the method used in the other two trials.Results: Risks of main outcomes in both treatment groups and effects of surgery did not differ between trials. Data for 6092 patients, with 35000 patient-years of follow-up, were therefore pooled. Surgery increased the 5-year risk of ipsilateral ischaemic stroke in patients with less than 30% stenosis (n=1746, absolute risk reduction -2.2%, p=0.05), had no effect in patients with 30-49% stenosis (1429, 3.2%, p=0.6), was of marginal benefit in those with 50-69% stenosis (1549, 4.6%, p=0.04), and was highly beneficial in those with 70% stenosis or greater without near-occlusion (1095, 16.0%, p<0.001). There was a trend towards benefit from surgery in patients with near-occlusion at 2 years' follow-up (262, 5.6%, p=0.19), but no benefit at 5 years (-1.7%, p=0.9).Interpretation: Re-analysis of the trials with the same measurements and definitions yielded highly consistent results. Surgery is of some benefit for patients with 50-69% symptomatic stenosis, and highly beneficial for those with 70% symptomatic stenosis or greater but without near-occlusion. Benefit in patients with carotid near-occlusion is marginal in the short-term and uncertain in the long-term.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        diagnostic images
        pictorial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N