Comparison between biventricular pacing and single site pacing in patients with poor ventricular function: a hemodynamic study.

Biventricular pacing has been suggested as offering greater hemodynamic benefit than single site pacing in patients with advanced heart failure and left bundle branch block. This was tested using acute multisite pacing. Eighteen such patients were atrialsensed, ventricular multisite paced in random...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology Vol. 26; no. 2; pp. 551 - 559
Autores principales: Varma C, O'Callaghan P, Rowland E, Mahon NG, McKenna W, Camm AJ, Brecker SJD
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Wiley-Blackwell Feb2003
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106879074&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 106879074
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01478389
        4F8
      jtl: Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
      issn: 01478389
      maglogo: Y
    pubinfo:
      dt: Feb2003
      vid: 26
      iid: 2
      pid: 480
      pub: Wiley-Blackwell
      place: Malden, Massachusetts
    artinfo:
      ui:
        106879074
        106879074
        2003138309
        10.1046/j.1460-9592.2003.00093.x
        106879074
      ppf: 551
      ppct: 8
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: P
      tig:
        atl: Comparison between biventricular pacing and single site pacing in patients with poor ventricular function: a hemodynamic study.
      aug:
        au:
          Varma C
          O'Callaghan P
          Rowland E
          Mahon NG
          McKenna W
          Camm AJ
          Brecker SJD
        affil: Department of Cardiological Sciences, St. George's Hospital Medical School, Cranmer Terrace, London SW17 ORE, UK; cvarma@sghms.ac.uk
      sug:
        subj:
          Bundle-Branch Block Therapy
          Cardiac Pacing, Artificial Methods
          Heart Failure Therapy
          Hemodynamics
          Aged
          Cardiac Output
          Descriptive Statistics
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Middle Age
          Multiple Regression
          Odds Ratio
          Pearson's Correlation Coefficient
          Post Hoc Analysis
          Predictive Value of Tests
          Pulmonary Wedge Pressure
          Sensitivity and Specificity
          Two-Tailed Test
          Two-Way Analysis of Variance
          Funding Source
          Human
          Aged: 65+ years
          Middle Aged: 45-64 years
      ab: Biventricular pacing has been suggested as offering greater hemodynamic benefit than single site pacing in patients with advanced heart failure and left bundle branch block. This was tested using acute multisite pacing. Eighteen such patients were atrialsensed, ventricular multisite paced in random order for 5 minutes. The best achieved measure of cardiac output (CO), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and left ventricular (LV) + dP/dtmax at RV, LV, and biventricular pacing sites compared. Baseline PCWP, CO, and LV + dP/dtmax were 20 +/- 10 mmHg 4.8 +/- 1.3 L/min and 680 +/- 173 mmHg/s respectively. In all 18 patients CO and in 17 of 18 patients LV + dP/dtmax and PCWP improved with pacing. In the group as a whole, no significant hemodynamic difference between pacing sites was observed in PCWP (pacing site RV 19 +/- 10 mmHg, LV 17 +/- 10, biventricular 18 +/- 11) or CO (RV 5.2 +/- 1.5 L/min, LV 5.1 +/- 1.5, biventricular 5.3 +/- 1.7). Increased stroke volume/PCWP with LV (5.6 +/- 3.7 mLs/mmHg) and biventricular pacing (5.4 +/- 4.0) were not significantly greater compared to RV pacing (4.7 +/- 3.0, ANOVA P = 0.20). Increase in LV + dP/dtmax with pacing at LV (814 +/- 190 mmHg/s) and biventricular (839 +/- 290) sites was not significantly greater than the increase with RV pacing (769 +/- 203 mmHg/s, ANOVA P = 0.30). Pacing in patients with heart failure and conduction delay can produce a hemodynamic benefit. There is individual variation in the pacing site that leads to the greatest improvement. In the group as a whole, biventricular and LV pacing produced only modest improvements compared to RV pacing.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N