Comparison of capillary blood sampling using an automated incision device with and without warming the heel.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if heel warming prior to heelstick increases the volume of blood collected compared to no warming. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial involving 100 preterm and term infants requiring capillary blood sampling (CBS), randomized to receive warming (Control) (n=50) or nonw...
| Publicado en: | Journal of Perinatology Vol. 22; no. 2; pp. 154 - 159 |
|---|---|
| Autores principales: | , , , , |
| Formato: | clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Publicado: |
Springer Nature
Mar2002
|
| Acceso en línea: | Ver este registro en EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=106950016&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 106950016 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 07438346 DZF jtl: Journal of Perinatology issn: 07438346 maglogo: Y pubinfo: dt: Mar2002 vid: 22 iid: 2 pid: 2579 pub: Springer Nature place: Dordrecht, <Blank> artinfo: ui: 106950016 2002086168 10.1038/sj.jp.7210583 NLM11896522 106950016 ppf: 154 ppct: 5 formats: fmt: @attributes: type: P tig: atl: Comparison of capillary blood sampling using an automated incision device with and without warming the heel. aug: au: Janes M Pinelli J Landry S Downey S Paes B affil: Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster Division, HSC-4G-Neo, Box 2000, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5 sug: subj: Blood Specimen Collection Methods Blood Specimen Collection Equipment and Supplies Capillaries Pain Prevention and Control Heel Heat Clinical Trials Convenience Sample Chi Square Test T-Tests Data Analysis Software Infant, Newborn Funding Source Human Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month ab: OBJECTIVE: To determine if heel warming prior to heelstick increases the volume of blood collected compared to no warming. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial involving 100 preterm and term infants requiring capillary blood sampling (CBS), randomized to receive warming (Control) (n=50) or nonwarming (Experimental) (n=50). RESULTS: This sample of infants showed no benefit of warming the heel prior to CBS. Volume of blood, collection time, crying time, and repeat procedures were not different between groups. More infants in the Control group received squeezing during the procedure compared to the Experimental group. CONCLUSION: Heel warming prior to CBS may be an unnecessary technique in preterm and term infants that expends nursing time and hospital financial cost. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|