Individual differences in effectiveness of cochlear implants in children who are prelingually deaf: new process measures of performance.

The efficacy of cochlear implants in children who are deaf has been firmly established in the literature. However, the effectiveness of cochlear implants varies widely and is influenced by demographic and experiential factors. Several key findings suggest new directions for research on central audit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Volta Review Vol. 101; no. 3; pp. 111 - 165
Autores principales: Pisoni DB, Cleary M, Geers AE, Tobey EA
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf Summer99
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107007518&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107007518
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00428639
        VLT
      jtl: Volta Review
      issn: 00428639
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Summer99
      vid: 101
      iid: 3
      pid: 954
      pub: Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf
      place: Washington, District of Columbia
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107007518
        107007518
        2001025368
        107007518
      ppf: 111
      ppct: 54
      formats:
        fmt:
          @attributes:
            type: T
      tig:
        atl: Individual differences in effectiveness of cochlear implants in children who are prelingually deaf: new process measures of performance.
      aug:
        au:
          Pisoni DB
          Cleary M
          Geers AE
          Tobey EA
        affil: Chancellors' Professor of Psychology and Cognitive Science and Director, Speech Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, Indiana University
      sug:
        subj:
          Cochlear Implant In Infancy and Childhood
          Deafness In Infancy and Childhood
          Treatment Outcomes Evaluation
          Outcome Assessment
          Outcomes Research
          Age Factors
          Infant
          Child, Preschool
          Child
          Comparative Studies
          Language Tests
          Speech Discrimination Tests
          Speech Perception
          Speech Intelligibility
          Descriptive Statistics
          Correlation Coefficient
          Memory
          Intelligence Tests
          Rehabilitation of Persons with Hearing Loss
          Funding Source
          Human
          Infant: 1-23 months
          Child, Preschool: 2-5 years
          Child: 6-12 years
      ab: The efficacy of cochlear implants in children who are deaf has been firmly established in the literature. However, the effectiveness of cochlear implants varies widely and is influenced by demographic and experiential factors. Several key findings suggest new directions for research on central auditory factors that underlie the effectiveness of cochlear implants. First, enormous individual differences have been observed in both adults and children on a wide range of audiological outcome measures. Some patients show large increases in speech perception scores after implantation, whereas others display only modest gains on standardized tests. Second, age of implantation and length of deafness affect all outcome measures. Children implanted at younger ages do better than children implanted at older ages, and children who have been deaf for shorter periods do better than children who have been deaf for longer periods. Third, communication mode affects outcome measures. Children from 'oral-only' environments do much better on standardized tests that assess phonological processing skills than children who use Total Communication. Fourth, at the present time there are no preimplant predictors of outcome performance in young children. The underlying perceptual, cognitive, and linguistic abilities and skills emerge after implantation and improve over time. Finally, there are no significant differences in audiological outcome measures among current implant devices or processing strategies. This finding suggests that the major source of variance in outcome measures lies in the neural and cognitive information processing operations that the user applies to the signal provided by the implant. Taken together, this overall pattern of results suggests that higher-level central processes such as perception, attention, learning, and memory may play important roles in explaining the large individual differences observed among users of cochlear implants. Investigations of the content and flow of information in the central nervous system and interactions between sensory input and stored knowledge may provide important new insights into the basis of individual differences. Knowledge about the underlying basis of individual differences may also help in developing new intervention strategies to improve the effectiveness of cochlear implants in children who show relatively poor development of oral/aural language skills.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N