Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.

Background: For 3-4% of pregnancies, the fetus will be in the breech presentation at term. For most of these women, the approach to delivery is controversial. We did a randomised trial to compare a policy of planned caesarean section with a policy of planned vaginal birth for selected breech-present...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lancet Vol. 356; no. 9239; pp. 1375 - 1384
Main Authors: Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR, Hannah, M E, Hannah, W J, Hewson, S A, Hodnett, E D, Saigal, S, Willan, A R
Format: clinical trial research tables/charts Journal Article
Published: Lancet 10/21/2000
Online Access:View this record in EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107015619&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107015619
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        01406736
        LAN
      jtl: Lancet
      issn: 01406736
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: 10/21/2000
      vid: 356
      iid: 9239
      pid: 1297
      pub: Lancet
      place: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107015619
        107015619
        NLM11052579
        2001033801
        10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02840-3
        NLM11052579
        107015619
      ppf: 1375
      ppct: 9
      formats:
        fmt:
          – @attributes:
              type: T
          – @attributes:
              type: P
      tig:
        atl: Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group.
      aug:
        au:
          Hannah ME
          Hannah WJ
          Hewson SA
          Hodnett ED
          Saigal S
          Willan AR
          Hannah, M E
          Hannah, W J
          Hewson, S A
          Hodnett, E D
          Saigal, S
          Willan, A R
        affil: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
      sug:
        subj:
          Breech Presentation
          Cesarean Section
          Pregnancy Outcomes
          Infant Mortality
          Pregnancy
          Female
          Vaginal Birth
          Pregnancy Complications
          Fisher's Exact Test
          Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test
          Relative Risk
          Confidence Intervals
          Infant, Newborn
          Adult
          Parity
          Clinical Trials
          Funding Source
          Human
          Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month
          Adult: 19-44 years
          Female
      ab: Background: For 3-4% of pregnancies, the fetus will be in the breech presentation at term. For most of these women, the approach to delivery is controversial. We did a randomised trial to compare a policy of planned caesarean section with a policy of planned vaginal birth for selected breech-presentation pregnancies.Methods: At 121 centres in 26 countries, 2088 women with a singleton fetus in a frank or complete breech presentation were randomly assigned planned caesarean section or planned vaginal birth. Women having a vaginal breech delivery had an experienced clinician at the birth. Mothers and infants were followed-up to 6 weeks post partum. The primary outcomes were perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, or serious neonatal morbidity; and maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity. Analysis was by intention to treat.Findings: Data were received for 2083 women. Of the 1041 women assigned planned caesarean section, 941 (90.4%) were delivered by caesarean section. Of the 1042 women assigned planned vaginal birth, 591 (56.7%) delivered vaginally. Perinatal mortality, neonatal mortality, or serious neonatal morbidity was significantly lower for the planned caesarean section group than for the planned vaginal birth group (17 of 1039 [1.6%] vs 52 of 1039 [5.0%]; relative risk 0.33 [95% CI 0.19-0.56]; p<0.0001). There were no differences between groups in terms of maternal mortality or serious maternal morbidity (41 of 1041 [3.9%] vs 33 of 1042 [3.2%]; 1.24 [0.79-1.95]; p=0.35).Interpretation: Planned caesarean section is better than planned vaginal birth for the term fetus in the breech presentation; serious maternal complications are similar between the groups.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        clinical trial
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N