Electronic submission of academic works: a survey of current editorial practices of radiologic journals.

Computers are nearly ubiquitous in academic medicine, and authors create and compile much of their work in the electronic environment, yet the process of manuscript submission often fails to utilize the advantages of electronic communication. The purpose of this report is to review the submission po...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Journal of Digital Imaging Vol. 14; no. 2; pp. 107 - 111
Autores principales: Jackson GW, Davidson HC, Wiggins RH III, Harnsberger HR
Formato: research tables/charts Journal Article
Publicado: Springer Nature Jun2001
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107052987&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107052987
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        08971889
        DOQ
      jtl: Journal of Digital Imaging
      issn: 08971889
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jun2001
      vid: 14
      iid: 2
      pid: 237
      pub: Springer Nature
      place: New York, New York
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107052987
        107052987
        2001084047
        NLM11440253
        107052987
      ppf: 107
      ppct: 4
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: Electronic submission of academic works: a survey of current editorial practices of radiologic journals.
      aug:
        au:
          Jackson GW
          Davidson HC
          Wiggins RH III
          Harnsberger HR
        affil: Electronic Medical Education Resource Group, Center for Advanced Medical Technologies, Salt Lake City, UT
      sug:
        subj:
          Electronic Publications Administration
          Medical Literature
          Radiography
          Surveys
          Human
      ab: Computers are nearly ubiquitous in academic medicine, and authors create and compile much of their work in the electronic environment, yet the process of manuscript submission often fails to utilize the advantages of electronic communication. The purpose of this report is to review the submission policies of major academic journals in the field of radiology and assess current editorial practices relating to electronic submission of academic works. The authors surveyed 16 radiologic journals that are indexed in the Index Medicus and available in our medical center library. They compared the manuscript submission policies of these journals as outlined in recent issues of the journals and the corresponding worldwide web sites. The authors compared the journals on the following criteria: web site access to instructions; electronic submission of text, both with regard to initial submission and final submission of the approved document; text hardcopy requirements; word processing software restrictions; electronic submission of figures, figure hardcopy requirements; figure file format restrictions; and electronic submission media. Although the trend seems to be toward electronic submission, there currently is no clear-cut standard of practice. Because all of the journals that accept electronic documents also require a hardcopy, many of the advantages gained through electronic submission are nullified. In addition, many publishers only utilize electronic documents after a manuscript has been accepted, thus utilizing the benefits of digital information in the printing process but not in the actual submission and peer-review process. Copyright © 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N