The validity of adding new tasks to the assessment of motor and process skills.
OBJECTIVE: Twenty-one new activities of daily living (ADL) tasks were evaluated for the validity of their inclusion into the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). METHOD: Data from 1,484 participants who performed at least one new AMPS task were analyzed to determine whether the new tasks (...
| Published in: | American Journal of Occupational Therapy Vol. 55; no. 4; pp. 409 - 416 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| Format: | research tables/charts Journal Article |
| Published: |
American Occupational Therapy Association
Jul/Aug2001
|
| Online Access: | View this record in EBSCOhost |
| fields | @attributes: recordID: 1 pdfLink: plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107076123&site=ehost-live header: @attributes: shortDbName: ccm uiTerm: 107076123 longDbName: CINAHL Complete uiTag: AN controlInfo: bkinfo: dissinfo: jinfo: jid: 02729490 44I jtl: American Journal of Occupational Therapy issn: 02729490 maglogo: N pubinfo: dt: Jul/Aug2001 vid: 55 iid: 4 pid: 6680 pub: American Occupational Therapy Association place: North Bethesda, Maryland artinfo: ui: 107076123 107076123 86055567 2001113420 10.5014/ajot.55.4.409 NLM11723985 107076123 ppf: 409 ppct: 7 formats: fmt: – @attributes: type: T – @attributes: type: P tig: atl: The validity of adding new tasks to the assessment of motor and process skills. aug: au: Bray K Fisher AG Duran L sug: subj: Activities of Daily Living Task Performance and Analysis Occupational Therapy Assessment Funding Source Descriptive Statistics Instrument Validation Scales Descriptive Research Goodness of Fit Chi Square Test Male Female Human Male Female ab: OBJECTIVE: Twenty-one new activities of daily living (ADL) tasks were evaluated for the validity of their inclusion into the Assessment of Motor and Process Skills (AMPS). METHOD: Data from 1,484 participants who performed at least one new AMPS task were analyzed to determine whether the new tasks (a) fit the AMPS many-faceted Rasch (MFR) model and (b) increase the range of the AMPS motor and process skill scales. RESULTS: Twenty of the 21 new tasks fit the MFR model. The AMPS motor scale was increased by .25 logit at the easier end of the scale and by .30 logit at the more difficult end of the scale. The AMPS process scale was increased by .14 logit at the easier end of the scale. The more difficult end of the AMPS process scale did not increase. CONCLUSION: These findings support the validity of adding 20 new tasks into the AMPS. The new tasks provide the following benefits for testing clients whose ADL ability levels are at the lower or higher ends of the AMPS motor or process skill scales: (a) potential for less error when estimating the ADL ability measures, (b) more task choices, and (c) more face-valid tasks for testing men. pubtype: Academic Journal doctype: research tables/charts Journal Article ougenre: Article language: English refInfo: holdings: @attributes: islocal: N |
|---|