A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effects of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program in a Swedish setting.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Family-centered developmentally supportive care of very low birth weight infants, provided by the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) has been reported to have positive medical and economic impacts. Our aim was to investigate its effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Publicado en:Pediatrics Vol. 105; no. 1; pp. 66 - 73
Autores principales: Westrup B, Kleberg A, von Eichwald K, Stjernqvist K, Lagercrantz H
Formato: research tables/charts randomized controlled trial Journal Article
Publicado: American Academy of Pediatrics Jan2000 Part 1 of 3
Acceso en línea:Ver este registro en EBSCOhost
fields @attributes:
  recordID: 1
pdfLink:
plink: https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ccm&AN=107101001&site=ehost-live
header:
  @attributes:
    shortDbName: ccm
    uiTerm: 107101001
    longDbName: CINAHL Complete
    uiTag: AN
  controlInfo:
    bkinfo:
    dissinfo:
    jinfo:
      jid:
        00314005
        PDT
      jtl: Pediatrics
      issn: 00314005
      maglogo: N
    pubinfo:
      dt: Jan2000 Part 1 of 3
      vid: 105
      iid: 1
      pid: 1659
      pub: American Academy of Pediatrics
      place: Elk Grove Village, Illinois
    artinfo:
      ui:
        107101001
        107101001
        2000027981
        10.1542/peds.105.1.66
        NLM10617706
        107101001
      ppf: 66
      ppct: 7
      formats:
      tig:
        atl: A randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the effects of the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program in a Swedish setting.
      aug:
        au:
          Westrup B
          Kleberg A
          von Eichwald K
          Stjernqvist K
          Lagercrantz H
        affil: Department of Clinical Science, Pediatrics, University Hospital, S-901 85, Umeå, Sweden. E-mail: bjorn.westrup@pediatri.umu.se
      sug:
        subj:
          Family Centered Care
          Infant, Very Low Birth Weight
          Clinical Trials
          Data Analysis Software
          Data Analysis, Statistical
          Female
          Funding Source
          Human
          Infant, Newborn
          Male
          Purposive Sample
          Sweden
          Infant, Newborn: birth-1 month
          Female
          Male
      ab: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Family-centered developmentally supportive care of very low birth weight infants, provided by the Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) has been reported to have positive medical and economic impacts. Our aim was to investigate its effect on need of ventilatory assistance, growth, and hospitalization in a Swedish setting. METHODS: Preterm infants born between September 1994 and April 1997 with a gestational age <32 weeks and with a need of ventilatory assistance at 24 hours were randomly assigned to either NIDCAP (n = 12) or conventional care (n = 13). The 2 groups were comparable (median [range]) with respect to birth weight (1083 [630-1411] vs 840[636-1939 g]), head circumference (24.0 [22.3-26.5] vs 24.0 [21. 1-30.0 cm]), gestational age (27.6 [24.0-28.7] vs 26.1 [23.9-30.3] weeks), female/male ratio (3/9 vs 9/8) and Clinical Risk Index for Babies (4.0 [0-11] vs 6.0 [2-15]). The infants in the intervention group were cared for in a separate room by a group of specially trained nurses. Formal weekly observations of these infants starting within 3 days after birth and continuing until 36 weeks postconception were used to develop individualized care plans. These plans provided recommendations as to how care might be attuned to the current developmental stage of the infant and how the family might be supported and stimulated to participate in this care. The treatment of the 2 groups was in all other respects identical. RESULTS: The duration of mechanical ventilation (median [range] was 2.8 [0-36.7] days in the intervention group vs 4.8 [.1-29.8] days; not significant [NS]) among the controls and continuous positive airway pressure was applied for 26.1 (6.9-52.0) vs 43.9 (5.0-65.1) days. Supplementary oxygen was withdrawn at 33.0 (29.3-35.7) vs 38.1 (33.1-44.9) weeks of postconceptional age (PCA). The weight gain up to 35 weeks of PCA was 13.0 (6.7-21.0) vs 9.8 (6.8-16.6) g/day (NS). The head growth up to 35 weeks of PCA was.73 (.56-1.3) vs.63 (.56-. 77) cm/week (NS). The age of the infant at discharge was 38.3 (36. 1-57.7) vs 41.0 (36.9-48.4) weeks of PCA (NS). CONCLUSIONS: NIDCAP does not seem to have detrimental effects on Swedish very low birth weight infants in comparison with conventional care. Indeed, NIDCAP might even be advantageous.
      pubtype: Academic Journal
      doctype:
        research
        tables/charts
        randomized controlled trial
        Journal Article
      ougenre: Article
    language: English
    refInfo:
    holdings:
      @attributes:
        islocal: N